As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 12, 2021
Registration No. – 333-251243
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT NO. 1
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
Classification Code Number)
Edison, New Jersey 08820
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
Chief Executive Officer
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.
3920 Park Avenue
Edison, New Jersey 08820
Tel: (732) 27225-8400
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
Anthony M. Saur
Morrison Cohen LLP
909 Third Avenue, 27th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Tel: (212) 735-8600
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time to time after this Registration Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box: ☒
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|Large accelerated filer||☐||Accelerated filer||☐|
|Non-accelerated filer||☒||Smaller reporting company||☒|
|Emerging growth company||☒|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|Title of Securities to be Registered(1)|| Amount to be|
| Amount of|
|Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share||34,669,680||(5)||$||14.28||$||495,083,030.40||(3)||$||54,013.55|
|Warrants to purchase common stock||325,000||(6)||$||--||$||--||(7)||$||--|
|Common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, underlying the warrants||9,075,000||(8)||$||14.28||$||129,591,000.00||(3)||$||14,138.38|
|(1)||The securities are being registered solely in connection with the resale of shares of common stock by the selling securityholders named in this registration statement.|
|(2)||Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), the registrant is also registering an indeterminate number of additional securities that may become issuable as a result of any stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization or other similar transaction.|
|(3)||Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(c) and Rule 457(g) under the Securities Act, based on the average of the high and low prices of the registrant’s common stock on December 3, 2020, as reported on The Nasdaq Capital Market, which was approximately $14.28 per share.|
|(4)||Calculated by multiplying the proposed maximum aggregate offering price of securities to be registered by 0.0001091.|
|(5)||34,669,680 shares of common stock registered for sale by the Selling Securityholders named in this registration statement, which includes (i) up to 29,644,680 shares of common stock that are held by the Eos Stockholders, (ii) up to 4,375,000 founders shares, and (iii) up to 650,000 shares of common stock that were a constituent part of the private placement units.|
|(6)||Represents the resale of 325,000 private placement warrants.|
|(7)||No separate fee due in accordance with Rule 457(i).|
|(8)||9,075,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the private placement warrants and public warrants (as defined below), based on the number of public warrants outstanding on as of December 4, 2020.|
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until this registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JANUARY 12, 2021
EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.
43,744,680 Shares of Common Stock
325,000 Warrants to Purchase Common Stock
The selling securityholders named in this prospectus may offer and sell from time to time up to 34,669,680 shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and warrants to purchase up to 325,000 shares of common stock, consisting of:
|●||up to 4,375,000 founder shares originally issued in a private placement to the Sponsor and subsequently distributed in part to to certain BMRG directors and members of the Sponsor;|
|●||up to 325,000 private placement warrants issued in a private placement to the Sponsor ;|
|●||up to 29,644,680 shares of common stock held by other Selling Securityholders of the Company; and|
|●||up to 650,000 shares of common stock that were a constituent part of the private placement units (as defined below).|
In addition, this prospectus relates to the offer and sale of up to 8,750,000 shares of common stock that are issuable by us upon the exercise of the public warrants (as defined below), which were previously registered, and up to 325,000 shares of common stock underlying private placement warrants issued in a private placement to the Sponsor.
The Selling Securityholders may offer, sell or distribute all or a portion of the securities hereby registered publicly or through private transactions at prevailing market prices or at negotiated prices. We will not receive any of the proceeds from such sales of the shares of common stock or warrants, except with respect to amounts received by us upon the exercise of the warrants. We will bear all costs, expenses and fees in connection with the registration of these securities, including with regard to compliance with state securities or “blue sky” laws. The Selling Securityholders will bear all commissions and discounts, if any, attributable to their sale of shares of common stock or warrants. See “Plan of Distribution” beginning on page 88 of this prospectus.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. This prospectus complies with the requirements that apply to an issuer that is an emerging growth company.
Our common stock and warrants are listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbols “EOSE” and “EOSEW”, respectively. On January 11, 2021, the last reported sales price of our common stock was $30.22 per share and the last reported sales price of our warrants was $14.05 per warrant.
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should review carefully the risks and uncertainties described under the heading “Risk Factors” beginning on page 4 of this prospectus, and under similar headings in any amendment or supplements to this prospectus. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The date of this prospectus is , 2021.
Table of Contents
|FREQUENTLY USED TERMS||iii|
|SUMMARY OF THE PROSPECTUS||1|
|USE OF PROCEEDS||21|
|MARKET PRICE OF OUR SECURITIES||22|
|UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIALINFORMATION||25|
|NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS||29|
|MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS||33|
|DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES||67|
|BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES||73|
|CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS||80|
|U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS||84|
|PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION||88|
|WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION||90|
|INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION||F-1|
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. No one has been authorized to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus. This prospectus is dated as of the date set forth on the cover hereof. You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus is accurate as of any date other than that date.
For investors outside the United States: We have not done anything that would permit this offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than in the United States. You are required to inform yourselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to this offering and the distribution of this prospectus.
Unless otherwise stated or unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Eos” refer to Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware corporation, the term “BMRG” refers to the Company prior to the consummation of the business combination. In this prospectus:
|●||“AltEnergy” means AltEnergy Storage VI, LLC.|
|●||“BRFBR” means B. Riley Securities, Inc.|
|●||“B. Riley Financial” means B. Riley Financial, Inc.|
|●||“BRPI” means B. Riley Principal Investments, LLC.|
|●||“BMRG” means B. Riley Principal Merger Corp. II.|
|●||“business combination” means the acquisitions and transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.|
|●||“Charter” means the third amended and restated certificate of incorporation of the Company.|
|●||“Class A common stock” means the Class A common stock of BMRG, par value $0.0001 per share. All Class A common stock was reclassified as common stock upon the consummation of the business combination.|
|●||“Class B common stock” means the Class B common stock of BMRG, par value $0.0001 per share. All Class B common stock was reclassified as common stock upon the consummation of the business combination.|
|●||“Closing” means the closing of the business combination.|
|●||“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.|
|●||“common stock” means the common stock of the Company, par value $0.0001 per share.|
|●||“DGCL” means the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.|
|●||“Director Nomination Agreement” means the director nomination agreement entered into at Closing between BMRG, the Sponsor, and certain of our equityholders.|
|●||“EES LLC” means Eos Energy Storage LLC.|
|●||“Equity Commitment Letter” means the Equity Commitment Letter, dated September 7, 2020, by and between BMRG and B. Riley Financial.|
|●||“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.|
|●||“founder shares” means the shares of common stock, which were formerly shares of Class B common stock purchased, by BMRG’s initial stockholders.|
|●||“GAAP” means United States generally accepted accounting principles, consistently applied, as in effect from time to time.|
|●||“IPO” means the Company’s initial public offering, consummated on May 22, 2020, through the sale of 17,500,000 units at $10.00 per unit.|
|●||“Merger Agreement” means the agreement and plan of merger, dated September 7, 2020, by and among BMRG, Merger Sub I, Merger Sub II, Eos, Newco and AltEnergy.|
|●||“Merger Sub I” means BMRG Merger Sub, LLC.|
|●||“Merger Sub II” means BMRG Merger Sub II, LLC.|
|●||“Nasdaq” means The Nasdaq Capital Market.|
|●||“Newco” means New Eos Energy LLC.|
|●||“NYSE” means the New York Stock Exchange.|
|●||“PIPE Investment” means the private placement pursuant to which certain stockholders collectively subscribed for 4,000,000 shares of common stock at $10.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $40,000,000.|
|●||“private placement” means the private sale of the private placement units simultaneously with the closing of the IPO.|
|●||“private placement shares” means the shares of common stock included in the private placement units.|
|●||“private placement units” means the 650,000 units at $10.00 per private placement unit purchased by the Sponsor in the private placement, each of which consists of one share of common stock and one-half of one private placement warrant. The private placement units were separated into their component parts upon the consummation of the business combination.|
|●||“private placement warrants” means the warrants underlying the private placement units issued in the private placement, each of which is exercisable for one share of common stock at $11.50 per share.|
|●||“Promissory Note” means the promissory note issued on February 4, 2020 to the Sponsor by BMRG, pursuant to which BMRG borrowed an aggregate principal amount of $300,000, and which was repaid using proceeds from the IPO on May 22, 2020.|
|●||“public shares” means the shares of common stock that were formerly shares of Class A common stock included in the units sold by BMRG in the IPO.|
|●||“public stockholder” means a holder of our public shares.|
|●||“public warrants” means the 8,750,000 redeemable warrants sold as part of the units in the IPO.|
|●||“SEC” means the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.|
|●||“Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.|
|●||“Selling Securityholders” means the selling securityholders named in this prospectus.|
|●||“Sponsor” means B. Riley Principal Sponsor Co. II, LLC.|
|●||“Subscription Agreements” means the subscription agreements between BMRG and certain other institutional investors related to the issuance of Class A common stock.|
|●||“transfer agent” means Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company.|
|●||“trust account” means the trust account established in connection with the IPO.|
|●||“units” means the units of the Company, each consisting of one share of common stock and one-half of one redeemable warrant of the Company, with each such warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $11.50 per share.|
|●||“warrants” means the private placement warrants and public warrants.|
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements provide our current expectations or forecasts of future events. Forward-looking statements include statements about our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, intentions, assumptions and other statements that are not historical facts. The words “anticipates,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intends,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predicts,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. There can be no assurance the future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward- looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this prospectus may include, but are not limited to, statements about:
|●||the ability to maintain the listing of our common stock on Nasdaq;|
|●||our ability to raise financing in the future;|
|●||our success in retaining or recruiting, or changes required in, our officers, key employees or directors;|
|●||our public securities’ potential liquidity and trading;|
|●||changes adversely affecting the business in which we are engaged;|
|●||unfavorable conditions or disruptions in the capital and credit markets;|
|●||our ability to forecast trends accurately;|
|●||our ability to generate cash, service indebtedness and incur additional indebtedness;|
|●||restrictive covenants that may limit our business and our ability to engage in certain corporate and financial transactions;|
|●||our ability to obtain capital on commercially reasonable terms;|
|●||fluctuations in our revenue and operating results;|
|●||competition from existing or new competitors;|
|●||risks associated with security breaches in our information technology systems;|
|●||risks related to legal proceedings or claims, including liability claims;|
|●||risks related to labor disputes;|
|●||risks associated with changes in federal, state, or local laws;|
|●||risks associated with potential costs of regulatory compliance;|
|●||risks associated with changes to U.S. trade policies;|
|●||risks resulting from the impact of global pandemics, including the novel coronavirus, COVID-19;|
|●||general economic conditions; and|
|●||other factors detailed under the section entitled “Risk Factors” herein.|
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.
An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. Our business, prospects, financial condition, or operating results could be harmed by any of these risks, as well as other risks not known to us or that we consider immaterial as of the date of this prospectus. The trading price of our securities could decline due to any of these risks, and, as a result, you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to our Business and Industry
We have a history of losses and have to deliver significant business growth to achieve sustained, long-term profitability and long-term commercial success.
We had net losses on a GAAP basis in each fiscal quarter since our inception. For the two-year period ended December 31, 2019 and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2020, we had $28.5 million, $79.5 million and $45.3 million in net losses, respectively. In order to achieve profitability as well as long-term commercial success, we must continue to execute our plan to expand our business, which will require us to deliver on our existing global sales pipeline in a timely manner, increase our production capacity, grow demand for our products, and seize new market opportunities by leveraging our proprietary technology and our manufacturing processes for novel solutions. Failure to do one or more of these things could prevent us from achieving sustained, long-term profitability.
As we transition from our research and development and our system pilot phase and into a full commercial phase, we expect, based on our sales pipeline, to grow revenues. However, our revenue may not grow as expected for a number of reasons, many of which are outside of our control, including a decline in global demand for battery storage products, increased competition, or our failure to continue to capitalize on growth opportunities. If we are not able to sustain revenue growth and raise the capital necessary to support our operations, we may be unable to continue as a going concern.
We identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and we may identify additional material weaknesses in the future that may cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or result in material misstatements of our financial statements. If we fail to remediate any material weaknesses or if we otherwise fail to establish and maintain effective control over financial reporting, our ability to accurately and timely report our financial results could be adversely affected.
As a public company, we are required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires management to certify financial and other information in our quarterly and annual reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of controls over financial reporting. Though we are required to disclose changes made in our internal controls and procedures on a quarterly basis, we will not be required to make our first annual assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 until the year following our first annual report required to be filed with the SEC. However, as an emerging growth company, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 until the later of the year following our first annual report required to be filed with the SEC and the annual revenues are $100 million or greater, or the date we no longer are an emerging growth company. At such time, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not effective.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with the audits of our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we and our auditors identified certain control deficiencies in the design and operation of our internal control over financial reporting that constituted material weaknesses. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
The material weaknesses resulted from our lack of (i) a formalized internal control framework, (ii) segregation of duties in the financial reporting process, (iii) review and approval of journal entries, and (iv) management review controls. These remain material weaknesses as of the date of this prospectus. In order to remediate these material weakness, we plan to hire additional personnel. In addition, we have implemented, and plan to continue to implement, new controls, new processes and technologies to implement formalized internal controls framework and procedures. We cannot provide any assurances that the measures that we have taken to remediate, and that will take to remediate, these material weaknesses will be sufficient to prevent future material weaknesses from occurring. We also cannot assure you that we have identified all of our existing material weaknesses.
In light of the control deficiencies and the resulting material weaknesses that were identified, we believe that it is possible that, had we and our registered public accounting firm performed an assessment or audit, respectively, of our internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, additional material weaknesses may have been identified.
When evaluating our internal control over financial reporting, we may identify material weaknesses that we may not be able to remediate in time to meet the applicable deadline for compliance with the requirements of Section 404. If we are unable to remediate our existing material weaknesses or identify additional material weaknesses and are unable to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting once we are no longer an emerging growth company, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our common stock could be negatively affected, and we could become subject to investigations by the stock exchange on which our securities are listed, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources.
Our relatively recent commercialization of our products makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects.
Since our inception, we sold only ten (10) Eos Znyth® DC battery systems to our customers. We began commercializing our products as recently as 2018, and while our research and development activities successfully established the efficacy of our chemistry, we struggled to incorporate our proven technologies into an effective manufacturing design. Although the relatively long research and development runway has given us the time to refine our designs and optimize our technologies, the latest generation of our products have been brought to market only recently.
Our success will depend on our ability to manufacture products at scale while timely meeting customers’ demands, and overcome any negative perception in the market related to our historical manufacturing challenges, and we may not be able to generate sufficient customer confidence in our latest designs and ongoing product improvements. Our inability to predict the extent of customer adoption of our proprietary technologies in the already-established traditional energy storage market makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects.
If demand for low-cost energy storage solutions does not continue to grow or grows at a slower rate than we anticipate, our business and results of operations may be impacted.
Our flagship product, the Eos Znyth® system, is a Znyth® battery that can be used as an alternative to lithium-ion (“Li-ion”) batteries. Our products are being piloted by eight blue chip utilities and commercial and industrial (“C&I”) end users. The pilots are being used on several use cases including, solar shifting, peak shaving, price arbitrage, utility ancillary services and microgrids. We cannot provide any assurances that utilities or C&I users will adopt our products as alternative energy storage solutions at levels sufficient to grow our business.
The viability and demand for our products, may be affected by many factors outside of our control, including:
|●||cost competitiveness, reliability and performance of our products compared to Li-ion products;|
|●||levels of investment by end users of energy storage products, which may decrease when economic growth or energy demand slows resulting in a reduction in battery purchases generally;|
|●||expansion of electricity use across the global economy, including growth of the electric vehicle market. If electric vehicles sales slow, thus diminishing the demand for Li-ion, then Li-ion competitors could move capacity to the stationary battery storage market to avoid shutting factories, which could put pressures on pricing in the market;|
|●||strength of the renewable energy industry and associated integration opportunities for our products;|
|●||a favorable regulatory landscape, including: full adoption by the states in the US of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Order 841, which mandates that battery storage can participate in the demand response and ancillary markets; incentives for the implementation of battery storage by state regulators; and adoption by Congress of an investment tax credit for standalone battery storage; and|
|●||the emergence, continuance or success of other alternative energy storage technologies and products.|
If we do not manage these risks and overcome these potential difficulties outside of our control successfully, our business and results of operations may suffer.
Failure to deliver the benefits offered by our technologies, or the emergence of improvements to competing technologies, could reduce demand for our products and harm our business.
We believe that, compared to Li-ion batteries, our energy storage solutions offer significant benefits, including the use of widely-available and low-cost materials with no rare earth components, full recyclability at end-of-life, a fifteen (15) to thirty (30) year product life requiring minimal maintenance, and a wide thermal operating range that eliminates the need for the fire suppression and heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment (“HVAC”), which would otherwise be required for use with Li-ion batteries.
However, if our manufacturing costs increase, or if our expectations regarding the operation, performance, maintenance and disposal of our products are not realized, then we could have difficulty marketing our products as a superior alterative to already-established technologies and impact the market reputation and adoptability of our products. In addition, developments of existing and new technologies could improve their cost and usability profile, reducing any relative benefits currently offered by our products which would negatively impact the likelihood of our products gaining market acceptance.
As we endeavor to expand our business, we will incur significant costs and expenses, which could outpace our cash reserves. Unfavorable conditions or disruptions in the capital and credit markets may adversely impact business conditions and the availability of credit.
We expect to incur additional costs and expenses in the future related to the continued development and expansion of our business, including in connection with expanding our manufacturing capabilities to significantly increase production capacity, developing our products, maintaining and enhancing our research and development operations, expanding our sales, marketing, and business development activities in the United States and internationally, and growing our project management, field services and overall operational capabilities for delivering projects. We do not know whether our revenues will grow rapidly enough to absorb these costs or the extent of these expenses or their impact on our results of operations.
Disruptions in the global capital and credit markets as a result of an economic downturn, economic uncertainty, changing or increased regulation, or failures of significant financial institutions could adversely affect our customers’ ability to access capital and could adversely affect our access to liquidity needed for business in the future. Our business could be hurt if we are unable to obtain additional capital as required, resulting in a decrease in our revenues and profitability.
The loss of one or more members of our senior management team or other key personnel or our failure to attract additional qualified personnel may adversely affect our business and our ability to achieve our anticipated level of growth.
We depend on the continued services of our senior management team, including our chief executive officer, chief strategy officer and chief financial officer, and other key personnel, each of whom would be difficult to replace. The loss of any such personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to implement our business strategy. All of our employees, including our senior management, are free to terminate their employment relationships with us at any time. We do not maintain key-person insurance for any of our employees, including senior management.
Additionally, our ability to attract qualified personnel, including senior management and key technical personnel, is critical to the execution of our growth strategy. Competition for qualified senior management personnel and highly skilled individuals with technical expertise is extremely intense. We face and are likely to continue to face challenges identifying, hiring, and retaining qualified personnel in all areas of our business. In addition, integrating new employees into our team could prove disruptive to our operations, require substantial resources and management attention, and ultimately prove unsuccessful. Our failure to attract and retain qualified senior management and other key technical personnel could limit or delay our strategic efforts, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Third parties might attempt to gain unauthorized access to our network or seek to compromise our products and services.
From time to time, we may face attempts by others to gain unauthorized access through the Internet or to introduce malicious software to our IT systems. We or our products may be a target of computer hackers, organizations or malicious attackers who attempt to:
|●||gain access to our network or data centers or those of our customers;|
|●||steal proprietary information related to our business, products, employees, and customers;|
|●||or interrupt our systems or those of our customers.|
From time to time, we encounter intrusions or attempts at gaining unauthorized access to our network and we routinely run intrusion checks. To date, none has resulted in any material adverse impact to our business or operations; however, there can be no guarantee that such intrusions will not be material in the future. While we seek to detect and investigate all unauthorized attempts and attacks against our network and products, and to prevent their recurrence where practicable through changes to our internal processes and tools and/or changes to our products, we remain potentially vulnerable to additional known or unknown threats. In addition to intentional third-party cyber-security breaches, the integrity and confidentiality of company and customer data may be compromised as a result of human error, product defects, or technological failures. Cybersecurity breaches, whether successful or unsuccessful, and other IT system interruptions, including those resulting from human error and technological failures, could result in our incurring significant costs related to, for example, rebuilding internal systems, reduced inventory value, providing modifications to our products and services, defending against litigation, responding to regulatory inquiries or actions, paying damages, or taking other remedial steps with respect to third parties.
The failure or breach of our IT systems could affect our sales and operations.
Our email and collaboration tools are outsourced to a managed services provider, Delval Technology Solutions (“DTS”). While we regularly review the cyber security tools and other security protection provided by DTS and DTS regularly runs intrusion and other security tests on services provided to us, there can be no guarantee that a failure or breach of such systems will not occur. We operate a number of IT systems throughout our business that could fail for a variety of reasons, including the threats of unauthorized intrusions and attackers. If such failures were to occur, we may not be able to sufficiently recover to avoid the loss of data or any adverse impact on our operations that are dependent on such IT systems. This could result in lost sales as we may not be able to meet the demands for our product.
Furthermore, because our IT systems are essential for the exchange of information both internally and in communicating with third parties, including our suppliers and manufacturers, cyber-security breaches could potentially lead to the unauthorized release of sensitive, confidential or personal data or information, improper use of our systems, or, unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification or destruction of information or defective products. If these cyber-security breaches continue, our operations and ability to communicate both internally and with third parties may be negatively impacted. Additionally, if we try to remediate our cyber-security problems, we could face significant unplanned capital investments and any damage or interruption could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We may not be able to identify or complete transactions with attractive acquisition candidates. Future acquisitions may result in significant transaction expenses and we may incur significant costs. We may experience integration and consolidation risks associated with these future acquisitions.
We may from time to time selectively pursue on an opportunistic basis acquisitions of additional businesses that complement our existing business and footprint. The success of any such growth strategy would depend, in part, on selecting strategic acquisition candidates at attractive prices and effectively integrating their businesses into our own, including with respect to financial reporting and regulatory matters. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify attractive acquisition candidates or complete the acquisition of any identified candidates at favorable prices and upon advantageous terms and conditions, including financing alternatives.
We may not have sufficient management, financial and other resources to integrate and consolidate any future acquisitions. Any significant diversion of management’s attention or any major difficulties encountered in the integration of the businesses we acquire could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, which could decrease our profitability and make it more difficult for us to grow our business. Among other things, these integration risks could include:
|●||the loss of key employees;|
|●||the disruption of operations and business;|
|●||the retention or transition of customers and vendors;|
|●||the integration of corporate cultures and maintenance of employee morale;|
|●||inability to maintain and increase competitive presence;|
|●||customer loss and revenue loss;|
|●||possible inconsistencies in standards, control procedures and policies;|
|●||problems with the assimilation of new operations, sites or personnel, which could divert resources from our regular operations;|
|●||integration of financial reporting and regulatory reporting functions; and/or|
|●||potential unknown liabilities.|
In addition, general economic conditions or unfavorable capital and credit markets could affect the timing and extent to which we can successfully acquire or integrate new businesses, which could limit our revenues and profitability.
We are exposed to various risks related to legal proceedings or claims that could adversely affect our operating results. The nature of our business exposes us to various liability claims, which may exceed the level of our insurance coverage resulting in our not being fully protected.
We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business. Litigation can be expensive, lengthy and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. Responding to lawsuits brought against us, or legal actions that we may initiate, can be expensive and time-consuming. Unfavorable outcomes from these claims and/or lawsuits could adversely affect our business, results of operations, or financial condition, and we could incur substantial monetary liability and/or be required to change our business practices.
Our business may expose us to claims for personal injury, death or property damage resulting from the use of our products or from employee related matters. Additionally, we could be subject to potential litigation associated with compliance with various laws and governmental regulations at the federal, state or local levels, such as those relating to the protection of persons with disabilities, employment, health, safety, security and other regulations under which we operate.
A current stockholder has made certain allegations questioning the propriety of certain historical convertible debt issuances by us. While we believe that these allegations or any additional claims that may be asserted by such stockholder in connection with the approval of historical transactions or otherwise would be without merit, the results of any potential legal proceedings related to such claims would be difficult to predict. Whether or not the stockholder’s claim is successful, any litigation itself could be time consuming and expensive, and could divert the attention of our management away from their regular business. While the former EES LLC unit holders are required to indemnify us and certain others for, and pledge 40% of the portion of the merger consideration delivered to them in exchange for their units in connection with, any losses arising out of the above-referenced allegations (subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement), there is no guarantee that we will successfully collect sufficient amounts in connection with an indemnification claim or realize sufficient value from the pledged shares to cover the cost of any lawsuit commenced in connection therewith. If any potential lawsuit is adversely resolved against us or our board of directors, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We carry comprehensive insurance, subject to deductibles, at levels we believe are sufficient to cover existing and future claims made during the respective policy periods. However, we may be exposed to multiple claims, and, as a result, could incur significant out-of-pocket costs before reaching the deductible amount, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the cost of such insurance policies may increase significantly upon renewal of those policies as a result of general rate increases for the type of insurance we carry as well as our historical experience and experience in our industry. Although we have not experienced any material losses that were not covered by insurance, our existing or future claims may exceed the coverage level of our insurance, and such insurance may not continue to be available on economically reasonable terms, or at all. If we are required to pay significantly higher premiums for insurance, are not able to maintain insurance coverage at affordable rates or must pay amounts in excess of claims covered by our insurance, then we could experience higher costs that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Labor disputes could disrupt our ability to serve our customers and/or lead to higher labor costs.
We have approximately sixty-six (66) full time employees and one part-time employee as of September 30, 2020, none of whom are represented by unions or covered by collective bargaining agreements. If a union sought to organize any of our employees, such organizing efforts or collective bargaining negotiations could potentially lead to work stoppages and/or slowdowns or strikes by certain of our employees, which could adversely affect our ability to serve our customers. Further, settlement of actual or threatened labor disputes or an increase in the number of our employees covered by collective bargaining agreements can have unknown effects on our labor costs, productivity and flexibility.
Risks Related to our Products and Manufacturing
We must obtain environmental, health and safety certifications for Gen 2.3 product.
While our engineering is working closely with the Underwriters Laboratories (“UL”) and Technischer Überwachungsverein (“TüV”) certification agencies to certify our Gen 2.3 product against all applicable safety standards, there is no guarantee that such certification shall be obtained. From this certification, we also intend to expand our Gen 2.3 product certification to other national standards such as European Conformity (“CE”) marking in the European Union and the international certification of the International Electrotechnical Commission (“IEC”). Failure to obtain UL, IEC or CE certification would have a significant impact on our revenues, as such certifications are required by most of our customers.
Compared to traditional energy storage technologies, our products have less power density and efficient power and may be considered inferior to competitors’ products.
Traditional Li-ion batteries offer higher power density and a slower self-discharge rate than our batteries. If customers were to place greater value on power density and efficient power delivery over the numerous other advantages of our technologies, including the widely-available and low-cost materials with no rare earth components, full recyclability at end-of-life, a fifteen (15) to thirty (30) year product life requiring minimal maintenance, and a wide thermal operating range that eliminates the need for the fire suppression and heating, then we could have difficulty positioning our batteries as a viable alternative to traditional Li-ion batteries and our business would suffer.
We rely on ours contract manufacturers and their respective business practices to manufacture our products.
On August 21, 2019, we entered into a joint venture agreement with Holtec International (“Holtec”) and formed HI-POWER, LLC (“HI-POWER”), which is owned 51% by Holtec and 49% by us. While we are free to either establish our own manufacturing capability, form a joint venture with another party, or hire a contract manufacturing partner to manufacture batteries and products delivered outside of North America, HI-POWER has exclusive rights to manufacture batteries sold and delivered in North America by us, provided that HI-POWER meets cost, quality and delivery “performance metrics” as defined by HI-POWER’s board of directors and the applicable joint venture arrangements between Holtec and us. HI-POWER’s board of directors is comprised of two members designated by Holtec and two members designated by us. Actions of the board must generally be approved by a majority of the directors, except for certain actions that require unanimous approval.
We rely on the HI-POWER’s board of directors’ oversight to ensure that HI-POWER follows ethical business practices such as fair wage practices and compliance with environmental, safety, and other local laws. A lack of demonstrated compliance could lead us to seek alternative manufacturers, which could increase our costs and result in delayed delivery of our products, product shortages, or other disruptions of our operations. Violation of labor or other laws by HI-POWER or the divergence of a manufacturer’s labor or other practices from those generally accepted as ethical in the United States or other markets in which we do business could also attract negative publicity for us and harm our business.
We may experience delays, disruptions, or quality control problems in our manufacturing operations.
Our current manufacturing and testing processes do not require significant technological or production process expertise. However, any change in our processes could cause one or more production errors, requiring a temporary suspension or delay in our production line until the errors can be researched, identified, and properly addressed and rectified. This may occur particularly as we introduce new products, modifies our engineering and production techniques, and/or expand our capacity. In addition, our failure to maintain appropriate quality assurance processes could result in increased product failures, loss of customers, increased warranty reserve, increased production, and logistical costs and delays. Any of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant uncertainty in the United States and global economies as well as the markets we serve and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread throughout the United States and in various parts of the world and has resulted in authorities implementing numerous measures to contain the virus, including travel bans and restrictions, quarantines, shelter-in-place orders, and business limitations and shutdowns. We remain unable to accurately predict the full impact that COVID-19 will have on our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows due to numerous uncertainties, including the duration and severity of the pandemic and containment measures. Our compliance with containment and mitigation measures has not yet materially impacted our day-to-day operations, but there can be no guaranty that the pandemic will not disrupt our business and operations or impair our ability to implement our business plan successfully.
To support the health and well-being of our employees, customers, partners and communities, since approximately March 19, 2020 all of our non-essential employees have been working remotely. This represents approximately 74% of our workforce. In addition, we understand that the employees of many of our customers are working remotely, which may delay the timing of some orders as well as shipments and cash collections. There can be no guaranty that disruptions, such as staff not being allowed to enter our manufacturing facility or our supply chain being disrupted, to our operations caused by COVID-19 will not result in inefficiencies, delays and additional costs in our product development, sales, marketing, and customer service efforts that we cannot fully mitigate through remote or other alternative work arrangements. For example, COVID-19 caused a several week delay in completing the UL certification of the Gen 2.3 product due to the certification company being delayed in completing the in-person witness tests.
More generally, the pandemic raises the possibility of an extended global economic downturn and has caused volatility in financial markets, which could affect demand for our products and services and impact our results and financial condition even after the pandemic is contained and the shelter-in-place orders are lifted. For example, Eos may be unable to collect receivables from those customers significantly impacted by COVID-19. Also, a decrease in orders in a given period could negatively affect our revenues in future periods, particularly if experienced on a sustained basis. The pandemic may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in these “Risk Factors”, particularly those risks associated with our customers and supply chain.
We may not have sufficient insurance coverage to cover business continuity.
We rely on a single-source joint venture manufacturer. As a result, a sustained or repeated interruption in the manufacturing of our products by HI-POWER due to labor shortage, fire, flood, war, pandemic or natural disasters may interfere with our ability to manufacture our products and fulfil customers’ demands in a timely manner. Failure to manufacture our products and meet customer demands would impair our ability to generate revenues which would adversely affect our financial results.
Defects or performance problems in our products could result in loss of customers, reputational damage, and decreased revenue, facing warranty, indemnity, and product liability claims that may arise from defective products.
Since our inception, our business objectives have been focused on producing a safe, low-cost grid-scale energy storage solution to meet the increasing demand for and adoption of renewable energy generation assets. The current “Gen 2.3” battery design after years of research and prototype development has resulted in robust control of cell-to-cell spacing using a method which can easily be scaled for mass manufacturing at low cost.
Although our latest “Gen 2.3” products meet stringent quality requirements, they may contain undetected errors or defects, especially when first introduced or when new generations of products are released. Errors, defects, or poor performance can arise due to design flaws, defects in raw materials or components or manufacturing difficulties, which can affect the quality of our products. Any actual or perceived errors, defects, or poor performance in our products could result in the replacement or recall of our products, shipment delays, rejection of our products, damage to our reputation, lost revenue, diversion of our engineering personnel from our product development efforts, and increases in customer service and support costs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Furthermore, defective components may give rise to warranty, indemnity, or product liability claims against us that exceed any revenue or profit we receive from the affected products. HI-POWER provides us with a two (2) year manufacturing warranty, which we pass to our customers based on the use case of the customer and normal system degradation expected from such use case. We also offer customers an extended performance warranty of up to twenty (20) years at an additional cost to the customer. The price charged for any such extended warranty is based on the use case of the customer and the additional performance that such customer wishes to ensure. For extended warranties, this may require system augmentation or battery replacements, which would be provided at no additional charge beyond the price of the extended warranty paid by such customer.
We, in turn, provide a two (2) year design warranty to HI-POWER, which warrants that the DC battery design will be free of design defects for the two-year warranty period. As a result, we effectively bear the risk of design warranty claims for two (2) years after we or Holtec has sold any products manufactured by HI-POWER (or much longer, in the case of any extended performance warranty purchased by our customers). We also bear the full risk of any manufacturing warranty claims under its extended warranty after the initial two (2) year period covered by HI-POWER has expired. While we accrued reserves for warranty claims, our estimated warranty costs for previously sold products may change to the extent future products are not compatible with earlier generation products under warranty. Our warranty accruals are based on various assumptions, which are based on a short operating history. As a result, these assumptions could prove to be materially different from the actual performance of our systems, causing us to incur substantial unanticipated expense to repair or replace defective products in the future or to compensate customers for defective products. Our failure to accurately predict future claims could result in unexpected volatility in, and have a material adverse effect on, our financial condition.
If one of our products were to cause injury to someone or cause property damage, including as a result of product malfunctions, defects, or improper installation, we could be exposed to product liability claims. We could incur significant costs and liabilities if we are sued and if damages are awarded against us. Further, any product liability claim we face could be expensive to defend and could divert management’s attention. The successful assertion of a product liability claim against us could result in potentially significant monetary damages, penalties or fines, subject us to adverse publicity, damage our reputation and competitive position, and adversely affect sales of our products. In addition, product liability claims, injuries, defects, or other problems experienced by other companies in the battery industry could lead to unfavorable market conditions for the industry as a whole and may have an adverse effect on our ability to attract new customers, thus harming our growth and financial performance.
If we elect to expand our production capacity by constructing one or more new manufacturing facilities, we may encounter challenges relating to the construction, managements and operation of such facilities.
HI-POWER would maintain its exclusive rights to manufacture the batteries for our products sold and delivered in North America if it continues to meet the quality, cost and delivery timelines set by its board of directors and as further specified in the applicable joint venture arrangements between us and Holtec. However, if HI-POWER fails to meet these required performance metrics, then we would be free to establish our own manufacturing operations for North America, either directly or through other partnerships. Under these circumstances, we would have the right to transfer manufacturing processes, technology and know-how from HI-POWER to any such new facility. In addition, for sales outside of North America, we are free to establish our own manufacturing facilities or to partner with other companies to manufacture its products.
Accordingly, we may, in the future, seek to construct one or more manufacturing facilities designed to meet our product supply needs. Although we currently believe that we could build a new one (1) gigawatt-hour (“GWh”) manufacturing facility in less than eight months, we cannot provide any assurances that we would be able to successfully establish or operate our manufacturing facility in a timely or profitable manner, or at all, or within any budget that might be forecasted for such a project. The construction of any such facility would require significant capital expenditures and result in significantly increased fixed costs. If we are unable to transition manufacturing operations to any such new facilities in a cost-efficient and timely manner, then we may experience disruptions in operations, which could negatively impact our business and financial results. Further, if the demand for our products decreases or if we do not produce the expected output after any such new facility is operational, we may not be able to spread a significant amount of our fixed costs over the production volume, thereby increasing our per product fixed cost, which would have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to expand our manufacturing capacity would also greatly depend on our ability to hire, train and retain an adequate number of manufacturing employees, in particular employees with the appropriate level of knowledge, background and skills. Should we be unable to hire such employees, our business and financial results could be negatively impacted.
Risks Related to our Future Growth
If we fail to manage our recent and future growth effectively, we may be unable to execute our business plan, maintain high levels of customer service, or adequately address competitive challenges.
We have experienced significant growth in recent periods and intend to continue to expand our business significantly within existing and new markets. This growth has placed, and any future growth may place, a significant strain on our management, operational, and financial infrastructure. In particular, we will be required to expand, train, and manage our growing employee base and scale and otherwise improve our information technology (“IT”) infrastructure in tandem with that headcount growth. Our management will also be required to maintain and expand our relationships with customers, suppliers, and other third parties and attract new customers and suppliers, as well as manage multiple geographic locations.
Our current and planned operations, personnel, customer support, IT, information systems, and other systems and procedures might be inadequate to support future growth and may require us to make additional unanticipated investment in our infrastructure. Our success and ability to further scale our business will depend, in part, on our ability to manage these changes in a cost-effective and efficient manner. If we cannot manage our growth, then we may be unable to take advantage of market opportunities, execute our business strategies, or respond to competitive pressures. This could also result in declines in quality or customer satisfaction, increased costs, difficulties in introducing new offerings, or other operational difficulties. Any failure to effectively manage growth could adversely impact our business and reputation.
Our growth prospects depend on our ability to capitalize on market opportunities.
We believe that a number of market opportunities could help fuel our growth prospects, including the following:
|●||the pervasiveness of electric grid congestion, creating an opportunity to deploy batteries to reduce the peak energy usage of a customer in specific locations where infrastructure constraints create a need for transmission and/or distribution upgrades;|
|●||the demand for co-location of battery assets on solar or wind farms to store off-peak intermittent renewable energy production and provide on-peak energy at higher prices alternative energy; and|
|●||C&I end users’ adoption of alternative energy generation technologies to supplement or replace on-the-grid energy usage.|
If these expected market opportunities do not materialize, or if we fail to capitalize on them, then we may not be able to meet our growth projections.
Our planned expansion into new geographic markets or new product lines or services could subject us to additional business, financial, and competitive risks.
In the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we sold our products in a number of different countries, including the United States, India and the United Kingdom. We have in the past, and may in the future, evaluate opportunities to expand into new geographic markets and introduce new product offerings and services that are a natural extension of our existing business. We also may from time to time engage in acquisitions of businesses or product lines with the potential to strengthen our market position, enable us to enter attractive markets, expand our technological capabilities, or provide synergy opportunities.
Our success operating in these new geographic or product markets, or in operating any acquired business, will depend on a number of factors, including our ability to develop solutions to address the requirements of the electric utility industry and C&I end users, our timely qualification and certification of new products, our ability to manage increased manufacturing capacity and production, and our ability to identify and integrate any acquired businesses.
Further, any additional markets that we may enter could have different characteristics from the markets in which we currently sell products, and our success will depend on our ability to adapt properly to these differences. These differences may include regulatory requirements, including tax laws, trade laws, labor regulations, tariffs, export quotas, customs duties, or other trade restrictions, limited or unfavorable intellectual property protection, international, political or economic conditions, restrictions on the repatriation of earnings, longer sales cycles, warranty expectations, product return policies and cost, performance and compatibility requirements. In addition, expanding into new geographic markets will increase our exposure to presently existing and new risks, such as fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies and difficulties and increased expenses in complying with United States and foreign laws, regulations and trade standards, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended (the “FCPA”).
Failure to develop and introduce these new products successfully into the market, to successfully integrate acquired businesses or to otherwise manage the risks and challenges associated with our potential expansion into new product and geographic markets, could adversely affect our revenues and our ability to sustain profitability.
Our results of operations may fluctuate from quarter to quarter, which could make our future performance difficult to predict and could cause our results of operations for a particular period to fall below expectations, resulting in a decline in the price of our common stock.
Revenue from our battery sales is primarily recorded upon transfer of ownership of the product to the customer. Under our customer contracts, this transfer typically takes place upon shipment of the battery from our manufacturing facility but, in some instances, occurs upon delivery to a customer site or, even more infrequently, at the time of commercial operation. Because our revenues are generally derived from sales of hardware that may take many months to manufacture and prepare for delivery, such revenue can come in peaks and troughs based on the underlying customer arrangements. As a result, our quarterly results of operations are difficult to predict and may fluctuate significantly in the future based on the timing of product deliveries.
Forecasts of market growth in this prospectus may not be accurate.
Market opportunity estimates and growth forecasts included in this prospectus are subject to significant uncertainty and are based on assumptions and estimates that may not prove to be accurate. The forecasts and estimates in this prospectus relating to the expected size and growth of the markets for energy storage and other markets in which we participate may prove to be inaccurate. Even if these markets experience the forecasted growth described in this prospectus, we may not grow our business at similar rates, or at all. Our future growth is subject to many factors, including market adoption of our products, which is subject to many risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, the forecasts and estimates of market size and growth described in this prospectus, should not be taken as indicative of our future growth. In addition, these forecasts do not take into account the impact of the current global COVID-19 pandemic, and we cannot assure you that these forecasts will not be materially and adversely affected as a result.
Risks Related to our United States and Foreign Operations
We could be adversely affected by any violations of the FCPA, the U.K. Bribery Act, and other foreign anti-bribery laws.
The FCPA prohibits companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Other countries in which we operate also have anti-bribery laws, some of which prohibit improper payments to government and non-government persons and entities. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws. However, we currently operate in and intend to further expand into, many parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. In addition, due to the level of regulation in our industry and related energy industries, our entry into certain jurisdictions may require substantial government contact where norms can differ from U.S. standards. Although we expect to maintain strict internal control policies and procedures designed to guard against improper conduct, there can be no guaranty that our employees, agents, and business partners will not take actions in violation of our internal control policies. In the event that we believe or have reason to believe that our employees or agents have or may have violated applicable laws, including anti-corruption laws, we may be required to investigate or have outside counsel investigate the relevant facts and circumstances, and detecting, investigating and resolving actual or alleged violations can be expensive and require significant time and attention from senior management. Any violation of U.S. federal and state and non-U.S. laws, regulations and policies could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties, and curtailment of operations in the United States or other applicable jurisdictions. In addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Any of the foregoing could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The reduction, elimination or expiration of government subsidies and economic incentives related to renewable energy solutions could reduce demand for our technologies and harm our business.
To promote renewable energy generation and consumption, federal, state, local and foreign government bodies provide incentives to owners, end users, distributors, system integrators and manufacturers of alternative energy systems in the form of rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives such as system performance payments, payments of renewable energy credits associated with renewable energy generation and exclusion of certain renewable energy systems from property tax assessments.
Our business relies, in part, on the co-location of battery assets with solar and wind technologies. The market for on-grid applications, where solar or wind power is used to supplement a customer’s electricity purchased from the utility network or sold to a utility under tariff, often depends in large part on the availability and size of government and economic incentives that vary by geographic market. The reduction, elimination or expiration of government subsidies and economic incentives for on-grid solar electricity may negatively affect the competitiveness of alternative electricity generation relative to conventional and non-solar renewable sources of electricity and could harm or halt the growth of the alternative electricity industries. Because our C&I end user sales are generally expected to be made into the on-grid market, these changes could harm our business. For example, in 2015 the U.S Congress passed a multi-year extension to the solar Investment Tax Credit (“ITC”), which extension helped grow the U.S solar market. As of January 1, 2020, the ITC is being gradually reduced from thirty percent (30%) to twenty-six percent (26%) for both residential and commercial in 2020 and is expected to reach ten percent (10%) for commercial only in 2022. The reduction in the ITC could reduce the demand for solar energy solutions in the United States, which would have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
In general, subsidies and incentives may expire on a particular date, end when the allocated funding is exhausted or be reduced or terminated as solar energy adoption rates increase or as a result of legal challenges, the adoption of new statutes or regulations or the passage of time. These reductions or terminations often occur without warning.
In addition, several jurisdictions have adopted renewable portfolio standards, which mandate that a certain portion of electricity delivered by utilities to customers come from a set of eligible renewable energy resources by a certain compliance date. Some programs further specify that a portion of the renewable energy quota must be from solar electricity. Under some programs, a utility can receive a “credit” for renewable energy produced by a third party by either purchasing the electricity directly from the producer or paying a fee to obtain the right to renewable energy generated but used by the generator or sold to another party. A renewable energy credit allows the utility to add this electricity to its renewable portfolio requirement total without actually expending the capital for generating facilities. However, there can be no assurances that such policies will continue. For example, in December 2015, Nevada’s Public Utilities Commission increased the fixed service charge for net-metered solar customers and lowered compensation for net excess solar generation proposals to extend compliance deadlines, reduce targets or repeal standards have also been introduced in a number of states.
If the foregoing or any other subsidies and incentives applicable to alternative energy implementation or usage are reduced or eliminated, or the regulatory landscape otherwise becomes less favorable, then there could be reduced demand for alternative energy solutions, which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Changes in the U.S. trade environment, including the recent imposition of import tariffs, could adversely affect the amount or timing of our revenues, results of operations or cash flows.
We currently procure the felt required for our batteries and the electrical cables for the battery container from China, as we believe that the materials procured from our Chinese suppliers currently have the best overall performance and price compared to domestic alternatives. Escalating trade tensions between the United States and China have recently led to certain increased tariffs and trade restrictions. There can be no guaranty that these developments will not negatively impact the price of the felt used in our products. We believe we could obtain a similar performing felt and electrical cabling in the United States, but such sources would likely also charge a higher cost than our current suppliers, which would negatively impact our gross margins. It is difficult to predict what further trade-related actions governments may take, which may include additional or increased tariffs and trade restrictions, and we may be unable to quickly and effectively react to such actions, which could result in supply shortages and increased costs.
We could be subject to foreign exchange risk.
Our international sales are typically denominated in U.S. dollars or Euros. As a result, we do not have significant direct exposure to currency valuation exchange rate fluctuations. However, because our products are sold internationally, to the extent that the U.S. dollar strengthens against the foreign currency of a customer or potential customer, we may find our products at a price disadvantage as compared with other non-U.S. suppliers. This could lead to our receiving lower prices or being unable to compete for that specific customer’s business. Consequently, currency fluctuations could adversely affect the competitiveness of our products in international markets.
We have operations in the United States, which exposes us to multiple federal, state and local regulations. Changes in applicable law, regulations or requirements, or our material failure to comply with any of them, can increase our costs and have other negative impacts on our business.
Applicable laws and requirements address multiple aspects of our operations, such as worker safety, consumer rights, privacy, employee benefits and more, and can often have different requirements in different jurisdictions. Changes in these requirements, or any material failure to comply with them, could increase our costs, affect our reputation, limit our business, drain management’s time and attention or otherwise, generally impact our operations in adverse ways.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
If we fail to protect, or incur significant costs in defending, our intellectual property and other proprietary rights, then our business and results of operations could be materially harmed.
Our success depends to a significant degree on our ability to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights. We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret, and unfair competition laws, as well as confidentiality and other contractual provisions with our customers, suppliers, employees, and others, to establish and protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights. Our ability to enforce these rights is subject to general litigation risks, as well as uncertainty as to the enforceability of our intellectual property rights in various countries. When we seek to enforce our rights, we may be subject to claims that our intellectual property rights are invalid or not enforceable. Our assertion of intellectual property rights may result in another party seeking to assert claims against us, which could harm our business. Our inability to enforce intellectual property rights under any of these circumstances would likely harm our competitive position and business.
We applied for patents in the United States, Europe, Middle East, Asia and Australia, some of which have been issued. We cannot guarantee that any of our pending applications will be approved or that our existing and future intellectual property rights will be sufficiently broad to protect our proprietary technology, and any failure to obtain such approvals or finding that our intellectual property rights are invalid or unenforceable could force us to, among other things, rebrand or re-design our affected products. In countries where we have not applied for patent protection or where effective intellectual property protection is not available to the same extent as in the United States, we may be at greater risk that our proprietary rights will be misappropriated, infringed, or otherwise violated.
Our intellectual property may be stolen or infringed upon. Any lawsuits that we may initiate to protect our significant investment in our intellectual property also may consume management and financial resources for long periods of time and may not result in favorable outcomes, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Third parties may assert that we are infringing upon their intellectual property rights, which could divert management’s attention, cause us to incur significant costs, and prevent us from selling or using the technology to which such rights relate.
Our competitors and other third parties hold numerous patents related to technology used in our industry. From time to time, we may also be subject to claims of intellectual property right infringement and related litigation, and, if we gain greater recognition in the market, we will face a higher risk of being the subject of claims that we have violated others’ intellectual property rights. While we believe that our products and technology do not infringe in any material respect upon any valid intellectual property rights of third parties, we cannot be certain that we would be successful in defending against any such claims. If we do not successfully defend or settle an intellectual property claim, we could be liable for significant monetary damages and could be prohibited from continuing to use certain technology, business methods, content, or brands. To avoid a prohibition, we could seek a license from the applicable third party, which could require us to pay significant royalties, increasing our operating expenses. If a license is not available at all or not available on reasonable terms, then we may be required to develop or license a non-violating alternative, either of which could require significant effort and expense. If we cannot license or develop a non-violating alternative, we would be forced to limit or stop sales of its offerings and may be unable to effectively compete. Any of these results would adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We may be required to take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring and impairment or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations and stock price, which could cause you to lose some or all of your investment.
Unexpected risks discovered following the Closing may arise that cause us to write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in losses. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our securities. In addition, charges of this nature may cause us to violate net worth or other covenants to which we may be subject. Accordingly, our stockholders could suffer a reduction in the value of their shares.
Risks Related to Our Securities
To the extent that any shares of common stock are issued upon exercise of any of the warrants, the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market would increase.
We have 9,075,000 outstanding warrants to purchase 9,075,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per share, which warrants will become exercisable on the later of (i) thirty (30) days following the Closing and (ii) twelve (12) months following the IPO.
To the extent that any shares of common stock are issued upon exercise of any of the warrants to purchase shares of common stock, there will be an increase in the number of shares of common stock eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of a substantial number of such shares in the public market could adversely affect the market price of common stock.
Provisions in our Charter and Delaware law may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against our directors and officers.
Our Charter requires, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, that (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us, our directors, officers or employees arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or our Charter or our bylaws, or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us or our directors, officers or employees governed by the internal affairs doctrine may be brought only in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware, except any claim (A) as to which the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware determines that there is an indispensable party not subject to the jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery (and the indispensable party does not consent to the personal jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery within ten days following such determination), (B) which is vested in the exclusive jurisdiction of a court or forum other than the Court of Chancery, (C) for which the Court of Chancery does not have subject matter jurisdiction, or (D) any action arising under the Securities Act, as to which the Court of Chancery and the federal district court for the District of Delaware shall have concurrent jurisdiction. If an action is brought outside of Delaware, the stockholder bringing the suit will be deemed to have consented to service of process on such stockholder’s counsel. Although we believe this provision benefits us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law in the types of lawsuits to which it applies, a court may determine that this provision is unenforceable, and to the extent it is enforceable, the provision may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against our directors and officers, although our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, our Charter provides that the exclusive forum provision will not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Although we believe this provision benefits us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law in the types of lawsuits to which it applies, the provision may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against our directors and officers.
Provisions in our Charter may inhibit a takeover of us, which could limit the price investors might be willing to pay in the future for our common stock and could entrench management.
Our Charter contains provisions that may hinder unsolicited takeover proposals that stockholders may consider to be in their best interests. We are also subject to anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law, which could delay or prevent a change of control. Together these provisions may make more difficult the removal of management and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities. These provisions include:
|●||no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates;|
|●||a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms, which could delay the ability of stockholders to change the membership of a majority of the Board;|
|●||the right of our Board to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of our Board or the resignation, death or removal of a director in certain circumstances, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our Board;|
|●||a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which forces stockholder action to be taken at an annual or special meeting of our stockholders;|
|●||advance notice procedures that stockholders must comply with in order to nominate candidates to our Board or to propose matters to be acted upon at a meeting of stockholders, which may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of the Company; and|
|●||the requirement that a meeting of stockholders may only be called by members of our Board or the stockholders holding a majority of our shares, which may delay the ability of our stockholders to force consideration of a proposal or to take action, including the removal of directors.|
Future resales of common stock may cause the market price of our securities to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.
The Sponsor’s founder shares, private placement units, private placement shares, private placement warrants, and any shares of common stock issued upon conversion or exercise thereof are each subject to transfer restrictions pursuant to lock-up provisions in a letter agreement, dated May 19, 2020, between us and the Sponsor. Likewise, the Sellers party to the Registration Rights Agreement are contractually restricted from selling or transferring any shares of our common stock they received in connection with the business combination pursuant to the lock-up provisions contained therein. However, following the expiration of these lockup-up periods, neither such Sellers nor the Sponsor will be restricted from selling their shares of our common stock, other than by applicable securities laws. Additionally, investors in the PIPE Investment are not be restricted from selling any of their shares of our common stock, other than by applicable securities laws. As such, sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of our common stock. Upon completion of the business combination, the Sponsor, the Sellers party to the Registration Rights Agreement, and the investors in the PIPE Investment collectively owned approximately 83.3% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.
As restrictions on resale end and registration statements are available for use, the sale or possibility of sale of shares by the Sponsor, the Sellers party to the Registration Rights Agreement, and the investors in the PIPE Investment could have the effect of increasing the volatility in our share price or the market price of our common stock could decline if the holders of currently restricted shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them.
We may redeem the public warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to such warrant holders, thereby making your public warrants worthless.
We will have the ability to redeem outstanding public warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per warrant, provided that the closing price of our common stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, share dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any twenty (20) trading days within a thirty (30) trading-day period ending on the third (3rd) trading day prior to proper notice of such redemption. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws. Redemption of the outstanding warrants could force holders (i) to exercise the warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so, (ii) to sell the warrants at the then-current market price when the holder might otherwise wish to hold their warrants or (iii) to accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of the warrants. The private placement warrants are not redeemable by us so long as they are held by the Sponsor or its permitted transferees.
Our stock price may be volatile and may decline regardless of our operating performance.
Fluctuations in the price of our securities could contribute to the loss of all or part of your investment. The trading price of our securities could be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. Any of the factors listed below could have a material adverse effect on your investment in our securities and our securities may trade at prices significantly below the price you paid for them. In such circumstances, the trading price of our securities may not recover and may experience a further decline.
Factors affecting the trading price of our securities may include:
|●||actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial results or the quarterly financial results of companies perceived to be similar to us;|
|●||changes in the market’s expectations about our operating results;|
|●||success of competitors;|
|●||our operating results failing to meet the expectation of securities analysts or investors in a particular period;|
|●||changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts concerning us or the industries in which we operate in general;|
|●||operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to us;|
|●||our ability to market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;|
|●||changes in laws and regulations affecting our business;|
|●||commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving us;|
|●||changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of additional debt;|
|●||the volume of shares of our common stock available for public sale;|
|●||any major change in our board of directors or management;|
|●||sales of substantial amounts of our common stock by our directors, executive officers or significant stockholders or the perception that such sales could occur; and|
|●||general economic and political conditions such as recessions, interest rates, fuel prices, international currency fluctuations and acts of war or terrorism.|
Broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our securities irrespective of our operating performance. The stock market in general, and Nasdaq, have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the particular companies affected. The trading prices and valuations of these stocks, and of our securities, may not be predictable. A loss of investor confidence in the market for the stocks of other companies that investors perceive to be similar to us could depress our stock price regardless of our business, prospects, financial conditions, or results of operations. A decline in the market price of our securities also could adversely affect our ability to issue additional securities and our ability to obtain additional financing in the future.
There can be no assurance that the warrants will be in the money at the time they become exercisable, and they may expire worthless.
The exercise price for the outstanding warrants is $11.50 per share of common stock. There can be no assurance that the warrants will be in the money following the time they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, and as such, the warrants may expire worthless.
There can be no assurance that our common stock will be able to comply with the continued listing standards of Nasdaq.
The shares of our common stock and warrants are listed on Nasdaq. If Nasdaq delists the common stock from trading on its exchange for failure to meet the listing standards, we and our stockholders could face significant material adverse consequences including:
|●||a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;|
|●||a determination that our common stock is a “penny stock,” which will require brokers trading in our common stock to adhere to more stringent rules, possibly resulting in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our common stock;|
|●||a limited amount of analyst coverage; and|
|●||a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.|
The grant and future exercise of registration rights may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement which is described elsewhere in the prospectus, the parties thereto can each demand that we register their registrable securities under certain circumstances and will each also have piggyback registration rights for these securities in connection with certain registrations of securities that we undertake. The registration of these securities will permit the public sale of such securities, subject to certain contractual restrictions imposed by the Merger Agreement. The registration and availability of such a significant number of securities for trading in the public market may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.
We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock. Any future dividend payments are within the absolute discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, working capital requirements, capital expenditure requirements, financial condition, level of indebtedness, contractual restrictions with respect to payment of dividends, business opportunities, anticipated cash needs, provisions of applicable law and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.
Risks Related our Status as a Public Company
The obligations associated with being a public company involve significant expenses and will require significant resources and management attention, which may divert from our business operations.
As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (“SOX”). The Exchange Act requires the filing of annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to a public company’s business and financial condition. SOX requires, among other things, that a public company establish and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting. As a result, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur prior to the business combination. Our entire management team and many of our other employees will need to devote substantial time to compliance, and may not effectively or efficiently manage our transition into a public company.
We are currently an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and to the extent we have taken advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, as amended (the “JOBS Act”), and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other companies that are not emerging growth companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of SOX, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, our stockholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.
Further, section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. We intend to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. This may make comparison of our financial statements with certain other public companies difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.
We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (i) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our initial public offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion (as adjusted for inflation pursuant to SEC rules from time to time), or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our shares of common stock that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th, and (ii) the date on which we issued more than $1.00 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. If we are not able to implement the requirements of Section 404 of SOX, including any additional requirements once we are no longer an emerging growth company, in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, we may not be able to assess whether our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, which may subject us to adverse regulatory consequences and could harm investor confidence and the market price of our securities.
All of the shares of common stock offered by the Selling Securityholders pursuant to this prospectus will be sold by the Selling Securityholders for their respective amounts. We will not receive any of the proceeds from these sales.
We will receive up to an aggregate of approximately $104,362,500 from the exercise of the warrants, assuming the exercise in full of all such warrants for cash. We expect to use the net proceeds from the exercise of the warrants for general corporate purposes, which may include acquisitions and other business opportunities and the repayment of indebtedness. Our management will have broad discretion over the use of proceeds from the exercise of the warrants.
There is no assurance that the holders of the warrants will elect to exercise any or all of the warrants. To the extent that the warrants are exercised on a “cashless basis,” the amount of cash we would receive from the exercise of the warrants will decrease.
Our common stock and warrants began trading on The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) under the symbols “EOSE” and “EOSEW,” respectively, on November 17, 2020. BMRG’s Class A common stock, warrants, and units were previously listed on the NYSE under the symbols “BMRG,” “BMRG.WS,” and “BMRG.U,” respectively. BMRG’s Class A common stock, warrants, and units each commenced separate public trading on June 1, 2020. BMRG’s units automatically separated into the component securities upon consummation of the Business Combination and, as a result, no longer trade as a separate security. Prior the Closing, each unit of BMRG consisted of one share of Class A common stock and one public warrant of BMRG, whereby each public warrant entitled the holder to purchase share of Class A common stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per share of Class A common stock. Upon the closing of the Business Combination, BMRG’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, dated May 19, 2020, was replaced with the third amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. which, among other things reclassified all shares of Class A common stock as common stock.
The following table includes the high and low bid prices for our common stock and warrants for the periods presented.
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
On November 16, 2020 (the “Closing Date”), Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (formerly known as B. Riley Principal Merger Corp. II), a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), consummated its acquisition of Eos Energy Storage, LLC., a Delaware limited liability company (“Eos”), pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 7, 2020 (the “Merger Agreement”). The transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are referred to herein as the “Business Combination.”
In connection with the closing of the Business Combination (the “Closing”), the Company changed its name from “B. Riley Principal Merger Corp II” to “Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.”, (“EOSE”).
On November 12, 2020, the Business Combination was approved by the stockholders of the Company at a special meeting (the “Special Meeting”). The Business Combination was completed on November 16, 2020. In connection with the Business Combination, 6,442,195 shares of the Company’s common stock were redeemed at a per share price of approximately $10.10. Upon the Closing, the Company had 49,802,417 shares of common stock outstanding, 32,421,362 of which were held by non-affiliates of the Company.
For purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information, the aggregate consideration for the Business Combination was $300 million or 30 million shares.
Immediately prior to the Closing, pursuant to subscription agreements (the “Subscription Agreements”) with certain institutional and accredited investors (“PIPE investors”), the Company issued an aggregate of 4 million shares of common stock for $10.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $40 million.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements present the combination of the financial information of the Company and Eos, adjusted to give effect to the Business Combination and the equity financing provided by the Equity Commitment Letter and Subscription Agreements with PIPE investors. The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information has been prepared in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of September 30, 2020 assumes that the Business Combination and equity financing had been completed on September 30, 2020. The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the nine-months ended September 30, 2020 and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 gives pro forma effect to the Business Combination and equity financing as if they had been completed on January 1, 2019.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been presented for illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect what the Company’s financial condition or results of operations would have been had the Business Combination occurred on the dates indicated. Further, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information also may not be useful in predicting the future financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The actual financial position and results of operations may differ significantly from the pro forma amounts reflected herein due to a variety of factors. The unaudited pro forma adjustments represent management’s estimates based on information available as of the date of these unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements and are subject to change as additional information becomes available and analyses are performed.
This information has been developed from and should be read together with Eos’s audited and unaudited financial statements and related notes included herein this prospectus, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other financial information included herein the prospectus and the sections titled “BMRG’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” incorporated in the Company’s amended registration statement filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2020.
The Business Combination is accounted for under the scope of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, business combinations (“ASC 805”), as a reverse recapitalization, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded, in accordance with GAAP. Eos has been determined to be the accounting acquirer based on the evaluation of the following facts and circumstances:
|●||Eos’s senior management will comprise the senior management of the combined company,|
|●||Eos will have greater influence in putting forth the relative majority of the members of the initial Board of Directors,|
|●||Eos’s operations will comprise the ongoing operations of the combined company; and|
|●||The relative size of BMRG is larger based on assets|
ASC 805 provides that in identifying the acquiring entity in a transaction effected through an exchange of equity interests, all pertinent facts and circumstances must be considered, including: the relative voting rights of the stockholders of the constituent companies in the combined company; the existence of a large minority voting interest in the combined entity (if no other owner or organized group of owners has a significant voting interest); the composition of the board of directors and senior management of the combined company; the relative size of each company; and the terms of the exchange of equity securities in the transaction, including payments of any premium. The preponderance of the evidence discussed above supports the conclusion that Eos is the accounting acquirer in the Business Combination. Under this method of accounting, BMRG will be treated as the “acquired” company for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, for accounting purposes, the Business Combination will be treated as the equivalent of Eos issuing stock for the net assets of BMRG, accompanied by a recapitalization. The net assets of BMRG will be stated at historical cost, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded.
Description of the Business Combination
At Closing Eos’s security holders received aggregate consideration with a value equal to $300 million.
In the Business Combination, the Company merged with and into Eos, and Eos became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Upon the Closing, the Company changed its name to “Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.”
Financing for the business combination and for related transaction expenses consisted of:
|●||$176.8 million of proceeds from the Company’s IPO on deposit in the trust account (plus any interest income accrued thereon since the IPO), net of $65.1 million in redemptions of shares of Class A common stock in connection with the business combination; and|
|●||$40 million of proceeds from the Equity Commitment Letter and Subscription Agreements with PIPE investors.|
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information has been prepared after giving effect to the Business Combination, and the redemption rights exercised by the Company’s public stockholders, where 6,442,195 public shares were redeemed.
September 30, 2020
|Cash and cash equivalents||$||315||$||6,534||$||40,000||(1)||$||138,732|
|Vendor deposits – related party||3,143||3,143|
|Deferred transaction costs||2,386||(2,386||)(4)||—|
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets||236||211||447|
|Total current assets||551||13,319||129,497||143,367|
|Property and equipment, net||5,817||5,817|
|Intangible assets, net||330||330|
|Investment held in Trust Account||176,778||(176,778||)(3)||—|
|Investment in joint venture||2,017||2,017|
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY|
|Accounts payable and accrued expenses||$||1,809||$||15,453||(6,057||)(4)||$||11,205|
|Provision for firm purchase commitments||5,807||5,807|
|Convertible notes payable – related party||108,353||(108,353||)(5)||—|
|Payable to related party||44||44|
|Long term debt, current portion||912||912|
|Capital lease, current portion||11||11|
|Embedded derivative liability||371||(371||)(5)||—|
|Contract liabilities, current portion||310||310|
|Total current liabilities||1,853||131,217||(114,781||)||18,289|
ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC. UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET – (Continued)
September 30, 2020
|B. Riley |
|EOS Energy |
|Pro Forma |
|Pro Forma |
|Common stock subject to redemption||170,476||(65,066||)(3)||—|
|Contingently redeemable preferred units||118,624||(118,624||)(5)||—|
|Additional paid-in capital||7,048||39,999||(1)||395,661|
|Contingently Issuable Shares||16,150||(7)||16,150|
|Retained earnings (deficit)||(2,048||)||(249,416||)||(9,862||)(4)||(279,016||)|
|Total Stockholders’ equity||5,000||(228,800||)||356,600||132,800|
|Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity||$||177,329||$||22,293||$||(47,281||)||$||152,341|
ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC. UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020
|Total net revenues||$||—||$||35||$||—||$||35|
|Cost of goods sold||6,161||6,161|
|Research and development expenses||8,360||8,360|
|General and administrative costs||2,075||8,241||10,316|
|Grant expense, net||728||728|
|Total operating expenses||2,075||23,490||—||25,565|
|Operating income (loss)||(2,075||)||(23,455||)||—||(25,530||)|
|Other Income (Expense):|
|Loss from equity in unconsolidated joint venture||(133||)||(133|
|Interest expense – related party||(23,366||)||23,366||(1)||—|
|Change in fair value, embedded derivative||1,721||(1,721||)(1)||—|
|Income (loss) before income tax expense||(2,047||)||(45,348||)||21,645||(25,750||)|
|Income tax expense|
|Net income (loss)||$||(2,047||)||$||(45,348||)||$||21,645||$||(25,750||)|
|Earnings per Share|
|Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted||7,654,134||49,727,885||(2)|
|Basic and diluted net income per share||$||(0.27||)||$||(0.52||)(2)|
ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC. UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019
|B. Riley Principal Merger Corp. II (Historical)||EOS Energy Storage LLC (Historical)||Pro Forma Adjustments||Pro Forma Combined|
|Total net revenues||$||—||$||496||$||—||$||496|
|Cost of goods sold||8,332||8,332|
|Research and development expenses||11,755||11,755|
|General and administrative costs||—||7,710||7,710|
|Grant income, net||(469||)||(469||)|
|Total operating expenses||—||27,328||—||27,328|
|Operating income (loss)||—||(26,832||)||—||(26,832||)|
|Other Income (Expense):|
|Sale of state tax attributes||4,060||4,060|
|Loss from equity in unconsolidated joint venture||(178||)||(178||)|
|Interest expense – related party||(49,708||)||49,708||(1)||—|
|Loss on extinguishment of convertible notes||(6,111||)||6,111||(1)||—|
|Change in fair value, embedded derivative||(716||)||716||(1)||—|
|Income (loss) before income tax expense||—||(79,483||)||56,535||(22,948||)|
|Income tax expense|
|Net income (loss)||$||—||$||(79,483||)||$||56,535||$||(22,948||)|
|Earnings per Share|
|Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted||5,000,000||49,727,885||(2)|
|Basic and diluted net income per share||$||(0.00||)||$||(0.46||)(2)|
Note 1 — Description of the Business Combination
Basis of presentation
The historical financial information has been adjusted in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information to give effect to events that are (1) directly attributable to the Business Combination, (2) factually supportable, and (3) with respect to the statement of operations, expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results. The pro forma adjustments are prepared to illustrate the estimated effect of the Business Combination and certain other adjustments.
The Company’s historical results reflect the audited consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019, unaudited condensed balance sheet as of September 30, 2020 and unaudited condensed statement of operations for the nine-months ended September 30, 2020 under GAAP. Eos’s historical results reflect their audited consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019, unaudited condensed balance sheet as of September 30, 2020 and unaudited condensed statement of operations for the nine-months ended September 30, 2020 under GAAP.
Description of the Business Combination
As previously mentioned, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (formerly known as B. Riley Principal Merger Corp. II), a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), consummated its previously announced acquisition of Eos Energy Storage, LLC., a Delaware corporation (“Eos”), on November 16, 2020 (the “Closing Date”), pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 7, 2020 (the “Merger Agreement”). The transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are referred to herein as the “Business Combination.”
Under applicable accounting standards, Eos is the accounting acquirer in the Business Combination, which will be treated as a reverse recapitalization. Accordingly, the accounting for the transaction is similar to that of a capital infusion to Eos. Net assets of the Company will be stated at historical cost, with no goodwill or intangible assets recorded.
The following table sets forth the net assets of the Company as of September 30, 2020 (in thousands):
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets||236|
|Cash held in Trust Account||176,778|
|Accounts payable and accrued expenses||(1,809||)|
|Payable to related party||(44||)|
|Net assets acquired||$||175,476|
For purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information, the table below represents the sources and uses of funds as it relates to the Business Combination:
|Sources and Uses (in thousands)|
|BMRG Cash Held in Trust(1)||$||176,761||Stock Consideration||300,000|
|Issuance of Shares||300,000||Fees and Expenses(3)||22,329|
|PIPE(2)||40,000||Cash to facilitate growth(4)||129,366|
|Cash to redeeming shareholders(5)||65,066|
|Total Sources||$||516,761||Total Uses||$||516,761|
|(1)||Represents the amount of the restricted investments and cash held in the Trust account upon consummation of the Business Combination at Closing.|
|(2)||Represents the issuance, in a private placement to be consummated concurrently with the Closing, to third-party investors of 4,000,000 shares of Class A common stock.|
|(3)||Represents the estimated total fees and expenses incurred as part of the acquisition paid at the Closing.|
|(4)||Represents estimated remaining cash that will be used to fund operations/growth and working capital needs of the Company after the Closing.|
|(5)||Represents the redemption of 36.8% of the Company’s public shares through the exercise of the shareholders’ redemption rights.|
Basis of the Pro Forma Presentation
As a result of the consummation of the Business Combination, the Company will adopt Eos’s accounting policies. Eos may identify differences between the accounting policies of the companies, that when conformed, could have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of the combined entity.
Note 2 — Pro Forma Adjustments
(a) Adjustments to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2020 (in thousands)
The pro forma adjustments included in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of September 30, 2020 are as follows:
Represents pro forma adjustments to the cash balance to reflect the following:
|Investment held in Trust Account||176,778||(3)|
|Payment of transaction costs||(22,329||)(4)|
|Redemption of Class A Common Stock||(65,066||)(3)|
|(1)||Private Investment in Public Entity (PIPE) — Represents the issuance, in a private placement of equity, of 4,000,000 shares of Class A common stock at a price of $10.00 per share, upon the Closing.|
|(2)||Holtec Investment — Represents the issuance of preferred stock of the Company to Holtec International for its investment of $10 million in Eos, $7.5 million of which Holtec had funded as of September 30, 2020. The balance of $2.5 million was funded on October 15, 2020. Holtec International invested in Eos prior to the Closing and therefore became part of the existing Eos shareholder base to which common stock of the Company was issued.|
|(3)||Reflects the reclassification of $176.8 million of cash and cash equivalents held in the Trust Account, net of the $65.1 million of redemptions, available upon consummation of the Business Combination to fund the Closing. The redemptions represent 6,442,195 Class A common stock at a price of $10.10 per share with the remainder allocated to common stock at a par value of $0.0001 per share and any excess to additional paid-in capital. Class A common stock of BMRG that was not redeemed was rolled over into Class A shares of our common stock.|
|(4)||Reflects the payment of the acquisition-related transaction costs incurred of approximately $22.3 million for advisory, banking, printing, legal, and accounting fees that are either expensed or capitalized as part of the merger (see Sources and Uses table above). The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet reflects these costs as a reduction of cash with a decrease in retained earnings and additional paid-in capital (this is a preliminary allocation). These costs are not included in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations as they are directly related to the Business Combination and are nonrecurring.|
|(5)||Reflects the issuance of 30,000,000 shares as merger consideration in connection with the business combination and conversion of the convertible notes payable — related party and the associated embedded derivative of Eos to units of Eos, which were then exchanged for the common stock of the Company as well as the exchange of Eos’s historical common and preferred units to common stock of the Company.|
|(6)||Reflects the adjustment of BMRG’s historical common stock subject to redemption to equity of the Company.|
|(7)||Following the Closing, and as additional consideration for the merger, EOSE will issue within five years from the Closing Date to each unitholder of Eos its pro-rata proportion of a one-time issuance of an aggregate of 2,000,000 EOSE Shares (the “Earn-out Shares”), upon the occurrence of any of the triggering events mentioned below.|
The Earn-out Shares will be issued, following the Closing, and within five Business Days after i) the closing share price of the Company’s shares on the principal securities exchange or securities market on which the shares are then traded equaling or exceeding $16.00 per share for any 20 trading days within any consecutive 30-trading day period during the period from the closing date to the fifth anniversary of the closing date (“Earn-out Period”) or ii) a change of control during the Earn-out Period.
A triggering event shall only occur once if at all, and, in no event shall the unitholders be entitled to receive more than an aggregate of 2,000,000 Earn-out Shares, and if a triggering event does not occur during the Earn-out Period, no Earn-out Shares shall be issued and the Company will not have any liability under this clause. Because this is a reverse acquisition, contingent shares issued to the stockholders of the accounting acquirer should be included in earnings per share from the date of issuance.
The Company has estimated the fair value of the contingently issuable shares to be $16.2 million. This is a preliminary valuation which will be finalized in the accounting for the reverse recapitalization based upon the fair value as of the close of the merger. This is initially recorded as a distribution to shareholders and is presented as contingently issuable shares. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, any issuable shares would be transferred from contingently issuable shares to common stock and additional paid in capital. Any contingently issuable shares not issued as a result of a triggering event not being attained by the end of Earn-out Period will be cancelled.
|(8)||Share-based compensation. Represents the vesting of the certain performance-based awards associated with the historical share-based compensation plan of Eos. These awards fully vest upon a qualifying event (i.e. a qualified financing event), which will be recognized upon closing of the Business Combination. This vesting adjustment is considered to be a one-time charge and is not expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results; thus it is not reflected in the pro forma statements of operations.|
(b) Adjustments to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2020
The pro forma adjustments included in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the nine-months ended September 30, 2020 are as follows:
(1) Reflects the adjustment to interest expense and change in fair value associated with the conversion of Eos’s convertible notes payable — related party to the common stock of the Company.
(2) Reflects pro forma net loss per share based on 49,727,885 total basic shares outstanding upon consummation of the business combination of $(0.52).
(c) Adjustments to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019
The pro forma adjustments included in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 are as follows:
(1) Reflects the adjustment to interest expense, change in fair value, and loss on extinguishment associated with the conversion of Eos’s convertible notes payable — related party to the common stock of the Company.
(2) Reflects pro forma net loss per share based on 49,727,885 total basic shares outstanding upon consummation of the business combination of $(0.46).
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition to historical information, this discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from management’s expectations. Factors that could cause such differences are discussed in “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors.”
We design, manufacture, and deploy reliable, sustainable, safe and scalable low-cost battery storage solutions for the electric utility industry.
We were originally incorporated in Delaware on June 3, 2019 as a special purpose acquisition company under the name B. Riley Principal Merger Corp. II (“BMRG”), in order to acquire, through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses.
On November 16, 2020, we consummated the transactions contemplated by an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated as of September 7, 2020, by and among BMRG, BMRG Merger Sub, LLC, BMRG’s wholly-owned subsidiary and a Delaware limited liability company (“Merger Sub I”), BMRG Merger Sub II, LLC, BMRG’s wholly-owned subsidiary and a Delaware limited liability company (“Merger Sub II”), Eos Energy Storage LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Eos”), New Eos Energy LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eos and a Delaware limited liability company (“Newco”) and AltEnergy Storage VI, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“AltEnergy”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, (1) Merger Sub I merged with and into Newco (the “First Merger”), whereupon the separate existence of Merger Sub I ceased, and Newco continued as the surviving company (such company, in its capacity as the surviving company of the First Merger, is sometimes referred to as the “First Surviving Company”) and became our wholly owned subsidiary; and (2) immediately following the First Merger and as part of the same overall transaction as the First Merger, the First Surviving Company merged with and into Merger Sub II, whereupon the separate existence of the First Surviving Company ceased, and Merger Sub II continued as the surviving company and our wholly owned subsidiary.
Upon the closing of the business combination (the “Closing”), BMRG changed its name to “Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.”
The business combination is accounted for as a reverse recapitalization. Eos is deemed the accounting predecessor and the combined entity is the successor SEC registrant, meaning that its financial statements for previous periods are disclosed in the registrant’s future periodic reports filed with the SEC. Under this method of accounting, BMRG will be treated as the acquired company for financial statement reporting purposes.
As a result of the business combination, Eos became the successor to an SEC-registered and NASDAQ-listed company, which will require us to hire additional personnel and implement procedures and processes to address public company regulatory requirements and customary practices. We expect to incur additional annual expenses as a public company for, among other things, directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, director fees, and additional internal and external accounting, legal, and administrative resources, including increased personnel costs, audit and other professional service fees.
The Znyth® technology and development of an energy storage solution has a required us to raise a significant amount of capital since its founding. We will require additional capital to fund ongoing investments in its technology, working capital requirements and its growth.
Key Factors Affecting Operating Results
We anticipate beginning full commercial production of our Eos Aurora Gen 2.3 150|600 DC Battery System and delivering its first shipments to customers during the fourth quarter of 2020. Our testing of Gen 2.3 batteries produced in limited quantities during 2020 have indicated performance at expected levels pending movement into commercial production. While we expect the performance to be the same upon commencement of full commercial production, the manufacturing line for this battery system has not been fully tested. If performance of the battery system does not meet our specifications, we may need to reduce the speed of production to ensure we have quality batteries that meet its performance specifications. Any delay in production could affect the delivery of batteries during the fourth quarter of 2020 and the first quarter of 2021.
We are also in the process of getting a third-party product safety certification from Underwriter Laboratories (UL) for the Eos Aurora Gen 2.3 150|600 DC Battery System. While we anticipate receiving UL Certification, the certification has been delayed due to Covid-19 and is expected in the fourth quarter of 2020 or the first quarter of 2021.
Ours growth strategy contemplates increasing sales of a commercial battery system through our direct sales team and Sales Channel Partners. We anticipate its customers to include utilities, project developers, Independent Power Producers and commercial and industrial companies. As we intend to expand its sales both in volume and geography, we have started discussions with several companies in North America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia about partnering on selling our product in these regions. For some of these sales channels we have begun discussions ranging from being a reseller of our product to being a joint venture partner in the manufacturing of its battery system. We expect to continue expanding the direct sales force in North America, adding direct sales people outside North America, and entering into strategic alliances to advance our sales growth globally.
Integration of Alliance Partners
We may in the future seek to construct one or more manufacturing facilities, thereby expanding our manufacturing footprint to meet customer demand. Provided the arrangement with its joint venture partner HI-POWER continues to meet the quality, cost and delivery timelines set by the HI-POWER Board of Directors, HI-POWER would maintain its exclusivity to manufacture the batteries for products sold and delivered in North America. If HI-POWER fails to meet the required performance metrics, we can establish our own manufacturing for North America either directly or through other partnerships.
For sales outside of North America, we may establish our own manufacturing facilities or may partner with other companies to manufacture our products. The construction of any such facility would require significant capital expenditures and result in significantly increased fixed costs. If we establish our own manufacturing facility, we have the right to transfer the manufacturing processes, technology and know-how from the HI-POWER JV to any new facility. We cannot be certain that we would be able to successfully establish or operate our own manufacturing facility in a timely or profitable manner, in the event that we had to exit HI-POWER with little time to prepare.
We install, commission and provide for the operation and maintenance of our battery systems deployed to date, and for those battery systems forecasted to be sold during the remainder of 2020. As our sales expand in volume and geography, we will need to contract and train third parties to perform this function on our behalf. We are currently in discussions with certain third-party servicing companies with the intention to have these partners in place before the end of 2020. Failure to establish these third-party service providers may slow our ability to increase our sales volume and expand our geographic presence.
Market Trends and Competition
The global energy storage market is expected to grow to a cumulative 1,095 gigawatts (GW), attracting an estimated $648 billion in future investment by 2040. We expect the United States to represent over 15% of this global market. Approximately 3.3 GW of energy storage was commissioned globally in 2019, which is expected to increase to 4.7 GW in 2020 according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance (“BNEF”). In addition, according to BNEF over 1.9 GW of new utility-scale energy storage was announced in 2019. Favorable regulatory conditions and the rapid growth of solar photovoltaic (PV) plus storage applications throughout the United States are expected to grow the utility-scale energy storage market from 172 megawatts (MW) / 345 megawatt hours (MWh) in 2019 to 6,631 MW/17,563 MWh by 2025. Globally, over the same period, we expect the energy storage market to grow at a 53% compound annual growth rate from 6,480 MWh in 2019 to approximately 83,000 MWh in 2025.
The principal areas in which we compete with other companies include:
|●||product performance and features;|
|●||safety and sustainability;|
|●||total lifetime cost of ownership;|
|●||total product lifespan;|
|●||power and energy efficiency;|
|●||customer service and support; and|
|●||Made in America for U.S. customers.|
Lithium-ion currently has 95% or more market share for the stationary battery industry. We will be the first commercially available battery that does not have a lithium-ion chemistry. We anticipate demand for its battery system using Znyth® technology. This considers its unique operating characteristics, including a 100% discharge capability, flattened degradation curve and a 4-10 hour duration, as well as other characteristics related to safety and the cost of operating and maintaining our battery system. Our ability to successfully deploy our battery system technology and gain market share in the energy storage market will be important to the growth of our business. Our results could be negatively impacted by price reductions from large manufacturers of lithium batteries that seek to maintain or increase their market share.
We anticipate that other battery chemistries will emerge in future years thereby increasing its competitive landscape. As more battery chemistries are being developed, the competition for human talent will also increase. While we believe we can attract the right candidates given its unique battery, corporate culture and management team, our ability to retain and attract talented individuals will be important to the advancement of our technology and maintaining a competitive advance in the marketplace. As we make advancements with regards to our battery technology and offer next generation products, there is a risk that inventory on-hand as well as equipment or materials consumed in manufacturing or research and development may become impaired due to a change in our product design.
In North America, geographic distribution of energy storage deployment has been driven by regulatory policy with both federal and state level programs contributing to stable revenue streams for energy storage. Refer to the Business section for a description of these programs and the impact on our business.
We have implemented operational and protective measures to ensure the safety, health and welfare of our employees and stakeholders. This includes implementing work from home policies for non-essential employees, which constitutes 78% of our workforce. We have also ensured that all employees and visitors that visit our office have access to personal protective equipment and strictly enforces safe distancing. We will maintain these precautions and procedures until Covid-19 is under adequate control. To-date, Covid-19 has not had a material impact on our financials or our liquidity. To-date we have not materially altered any terms with customers, vendors or our financing sources.
Components of Results of Operations
Eos has primarily generated revenues from limited sales as it prepares to launch its next generation energy storage solution that is scalable and can be used for commercial application. Eos expects revenues to increase as it scales its production to meet demand for the next generation of its product.
Cost of goods sold
Eos’s cost of goods sold includes materials, labor, and other direct costs related to the manufacture of its energy storage product for sale to customers. Other items contributing to its cost of sales are manufacturing overhead such as engineering expense, equipment maintenance, environmental health and safety, quality and production control and procurement. Cost of goods sold also includes the provision for excess, obsolete and slow-moving inventories, depreciation of manufacturing plant and equipment, warranty accruals, as well as shipping, logistics and facility related costs. Eos expects its cost of goods sold to exceed revenues in the near term as we continue to scale its business.
In August 2019, Eos established a joint venture, HI-POWER, that will manufacture the Gen 2.3 battery system on its behalf. Upon launching commercial production of its Gen 2.3 battery system, Eos expects cost of goods sold to include purchases of the Gen 2.3 battery system from HI-POWER for sale to its customers.
Research and development
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and personnel-related costs as well as products, materials, third party services, and depreciation on equipment and facilities used in its research and development process. Eos expect its research and development costs to increase for the foreseeable future as Eos continues to invest in research and develop activities that are necessary to achieve its technology and product roadmap goals.
General and administrative expense
General and administrative expenses consist mainly of personnel-related expenses for executive and other administrative functions and expenses including corporate, executive, finance, and other administrative functions, expenses for outside professional services, including legal, audit and accounting services, as well as expenses for facilities, depreciation, amortization, travel, and marketing costs. Eos expects general, and administrative expenses to increase for the foreseeable future as Eos scales headcount with the growth of its business, and as a result of operating as a public company, including compliance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, legal, audit, additional insurance expenses, investor relations activities, and other administrative and professional services.
Grant expense, net
Grant expense, net includes expenses net of reimbursement related to grants provided by the California Energy Commission (“CEC”).
Sale of tax attributes
The sale of net operating loss represents the benefit recorded from the sale of its State of New Jersey net operating loss carryforwards to third parties.
Loss on equity in unconsolidated joint venture
The loss on equity in unconsolidated joint venture represents its proportionate share of the income or loss from its investment in HI-POWER LLC, a joint venture established with Holtec Power, Inc.
Interest expense consists primarily of interest incurred on its convertible notes, including the accretion of interest on convertible notes that contain embedded features that permit holders to demand immediate repayment of principal and interest.
Change in fair value, embedded derivative
The convertible notes issued during 2019 contained an embedded derivative feature that could accelerate the repayment of the convertible notes upon a qualified financing event not within its control. This embedded derivative resulted in the recording of a premium or discount on its convertible notes that was recognized in earnings upon their issuance.
Results of Operations
Comparison Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019
The following table sets forth its operating results for the periods indicated:
|Nine Months Ended |
|($ in thousands)||2020||2019||Change||Change|
|Costing and expenses:|
|Cost of goods sold||6,161||7,565||(1,404||)||(19||)|
|Research and development||8,360||10,105||(1,745||)||(17||)|
|General and administrative expense||8,241||5,228||3,013||58|
|Grant expense (income), net||728||(526||)||1,254||(238||)|
|Other income (expense)|
|Loss on equity in unconsolidated joint venture||(133||)||—||(133||)||NM|
|Interest expense – related party||(23,366||)||(30,851||)||7,485||(24||)|
|Loss on extinguishment of convertible notes – related party||—||(6,111||)||6,111||(100||)|
|Change in fair value, embedded derivative||1,721||(1,528||)||3,249||(213||)|
Revenue decreased by $0.2 million from $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 to insignificant amounts for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 as Eos transitioned its business to launch its next generation of energy storage solution, Gen 2.3, in the fourth quarter of 2020. Revenue during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 included limited product sales of initial versions of its energy storage product.
Cost of goods sold
Cost of goods sold decreased by $1.4 million from $7.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 to $6.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The decrease results as Eos significantly reduced its manufacturing operations during the second half of 2019 and throughout 2020 pending the commercial launch of its Gen 2.3 battery system, which is expected in the fourth quarter of 2020. Cost of goods sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 primarily includes costs related to excess, obsolete and slow-moving inventory which reflects its decision to launch the next generation of its energy storage solution and discontinue sales of earlier products. In addition, impairment charges were incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 for obsolete equipment relating to our prior generation battery. Cost of goods sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 primarily includes costs related to firm purchase commitments for Gen 2.3 battery systems in excess of the expected customer revenues that will be realized upon their sale to customers.
Research and Development
Research and development costs decreased by $1.7 million or 17% from $10.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 to $8.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The primary drivers for the decrease were a reduction in payroll expenses due to lower headcount as Eos transitioned its efforts from research and development activities to focus on the commercial production of its next generation energy storage solution, lower depreciation expense from reduced investments in research and development equipment, a decline in materials associated with lower research and development activity, as well as an impairment charge included in R&D expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 for obsolete equipment relating to our prior generation battery. These factors were partially was offset by increased expenditures during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 for testing of Gen 2.3 battery systems in preparation for its launch.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by $3.0 million or 58% from $5.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 to $8.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The increase is due to a $1.0 million increase in employee-related costs and professional fees incurred in connection with the proposed business combination with BMRG which are not capitalizable. Certain other transaction costs were capitalized and are presented as Deferred Transaction Costs in our balance sheet as of September 30, 2020.
Grant expense (income), net
Grant expense, net increased by $1.3 million or 238% from $0.5 million of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 to $0.7 million of expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The increase results from more expenses incurred in excess of reimbursable costs related to its research and development grants from the CEC for the nine months ended September 30, 2020.
Loss on equity in unconsolidated joint venture
The loss from equity in unconsolidated joint venture results from losses incurred in connection with the initial pre-production costs of its joint venture HI-POWER LLC. The joint venture has not yet commenced its principal operations related to the manufacture of the Gen 2.3 battery system. The joint venture was formed in August 2019 and therefore there is no significant activity recorded for the joint venture for the corresponding nine months ended September 30, 2019.
Interest income was not significant due to nominal investment balances during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019.
Interest expense was $0.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 as a result of an invoice securitization program entered into in January 2020 (see Liquidity section) as compared to insignificant amounts for the nine months ended September 30, 2019.
Interest expense — related party
Interest expense decreased by $7.5 million or 24% from $30.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 to $23.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. Eos’s convertible notes include an embedded feature that permits holders to demand immediate repayment of all outstanding principal and interest resulting in the immediate accretion of interest expense. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, proceeds allocated to the issuance of convertible notes was $17.4 million and Eos recorded $30.9 million of interest expense related to these convertible notes that include a demand feature that could require repayment of principal and interest during 2019. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, proceeds allocated to the issuance of convertible notes was $8.8 million, and Eos recorded $23.4 million of interest expense related to these convertible notes.
Loss on extinguishment of convertible notes — related party
The reduction in the loss on extinguishment of convertible notes of $6.1 million is the result of the modification in April 2019 of convertible notes issued during 2018 and January 2019.
Change in fair value, embedded derivative
The change in fair value of $3.2 million reflects the fair value of the embedded derivative feature on its convertible notes that was recorded through earnings.
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2019 to Year Ended December 31, 2018
The following table sets forth its operating results for the periods indicated:
|Year Ended |
|($ in thousands)||2019||2018||Change||Change|
|Costing and expenses:|
|Cost of goods sold||8,332||9,708||(1,376||)||(14||)|
|Research and development||11,755||14,574||(2,819||)||(19||)|
|General and administrative expense||7,710||7,158||552||8|
|Grant expense (income), net||(469||)||1,418||(1,887||)||(133||)|
|Other income (expense)|
|Sale of state tax attributes||4,060||4,476||(416||)||(9||)|
|Loss on equity in unconsolidated joint venture||(178||)||—||(178||)||NM|
|Interest expense – related party||(49,708||)||(144||)||(49,564||)||NM|
|Loss on extinguishment of convertible notes – related party||(6,111||)||—||(6,111||)||NM|
|Change in fair value, embedded derivative||(716||)||—||(716||)||NM|
Revenue was $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 related to sales of its initial energy storage solution for specific customer application. There were no revenue producing operations in 2018.
Cost of goods sold
Cost of goods sold decreased by $1.4 million or 14% from $9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to $8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease results primarily from a decrease of $3.9 million for costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2018 to provide an upgraded, better performing battery system to a customer to replace an older system that was not performing in the manner required, offset by an increase of $2.5 million in costs incurred related to sales during the year ended December 31, 2019 and an increase of $0.2 million related to impairment costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2019 for obsolete equipment relating to our prior generation battery.
Research and Development
Research and development costs decreased by $2.8 million or 19% from $14.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to $11.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease results primarily from a reduction in payroll expenses due to lower headcount as Eos transitioned its efforts from research and development activities to focus on the commercial production of its next generation energy storage solution. The decrease is also due to lower depreciation expense from reduced investments in research and development equipment and a decline in materials associated with lower research and development activity.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by $0.5 million or 8% from $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase is primarily due to higher professional fees related to its formation of the joint venture HI-POWER LLC during the year ended December 31, 2019. This was offset by a decrease in payroll costs associated with a decline in headcount as well as a reduction to rent expense from its decision to vacate office space leased from a related party.
Grant expense (income), net
Grant expense (income), net decreased by $1.9 million or 133% from $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to $(0.5) million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease results from the timing of reimbursements and level of research and development activity related to its grants from the CEC.
Sale of state tax attributes
Eos recognized income of $4.1 million and $4.5 million for years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively related to the sale of its state net operating losses and research and development credit carryforwards under the New Jersey Economic Development Authority Technology Business Tax Certificate Transfer Program.
Loss on equity in unconsolidated joint venture
The loss on equity in unconsolidated joint venture results from its portion of HI-POWER LLC’s losses incurred in connection with its organization and start-up expenses. The joint venture was established in August 2019.
Interest income was not significant due to nominal investment balances during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Interest expense — related party
Interest expense increased by $49.6 million from $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to $49.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Eos’s convertible notes issued during 2019 included an embedded feature that permits holders to demand immediate repayment of all outstanding principal and interest resulting in the immediate accretion of interest expense. During the year ended December 31, 2019, proceeds allocated to the issuance of convertible notes was $19.3 million and Eos recorded $49.7 million of interest expense related to these convertible notes that include a demand feature that could require repayment of principal and interest during 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2018, interest expense on convertible notes issued of $0.1 million was not material.
Loss on extinguishment of convertible notes — related party
The loss on extinguishment of convertible notes of $6.1 million is the result of the modification in April 2019 of convertible notes issued during 2018 and January 2019.
Change in fair value, embedded derivative
The change in fair value of $0.7 million reflects the fair value of the embedded derivative feature on its convertible notes that was recorded through earnings. This embedded feature was not included in the convertible notes issued in 2020.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2020, Eos had cash and cash equivalents of $6.5 million. As Eos historically has not generated revenues sufficient to cover its operating expenses, and does not generate positive cash flows from operations, its ability to continue as a “going concern” depends in part on its ability to raise sufficient capital as further discussed in Note 1 to the unaudited financial statements.
Since its inception, Eos has financed its operations primarily through funding received from the private placement of convertible notes and the issuance of common and preferred units. During the year ended December 31, 2019, Eos conducted two rounds of bridge financing, raising total proceeds of $23.2 million through the issuance of convertible notes and preferred units. A portion of its convertible notes and preferred units were issued to a related party that, together with its affiliates, has a beneficial ownership in its company that exceeds 10%. This related party also serves as the agent for all of the convertible notes issued under the bridge financing arrangement. The convertible notes were issued at deep discounts of approximately 67% of the redemption value, requiring us to amortize the discount into interest expense over the period during which the principal and interest becomes payable to the holder. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, Eos raised additional bridge financing proceeds of $18.1 million from the issuance of convertible notes and preferred units, $8.8 million of which is attributable to the convertible notes. The remaining bridge financing proceeds of $9.3 million is attributable to the fair value of preferred units issued. As of September 30, 2020, the outstanding balance of the convertible notes was $108.4 million.
In conjunction with the 2019 and 2020 bridge financing rounds, Eos entered into subscription agreements to sell preferred units equal to the face value of the convertible notes at a price of $0.50 per unit. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, Eos allocated proceeds of $1.3 million to the issuance of 7.5 million preferred units. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, Eos allocated bridge financing proceeds of $1.8 million to the issuance of 10.6 million preferred units. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, Eos raised an additional $7.5 million of cash proceeds from the issuance of 15.0 million preferred units at a price of $0.50 per unit, separate from the bridge financing transactions. At September 30, 2020, Eos had 68.2 million common units outstanding and 106.3 million preferred units outstanding. As of September 30, 2020, its preferred units were convertible into approximately 250.5 million common units.
Eos expects capital expenditures and working capital requirements to increase as Eos seeks to execute on its growth strategy. Following the consummation of the business combination, Eos received $129.7 million from BMRG cash in trust and Eos believe it will be sufficient to meet its working capital and capital expenditure requirements for a period of at least twelve months from the date of this registration statement and sufficient to fund its operations until it commences commercial production. Eos may, however, need additional cash resources due to changed business conditions or other developments, including unanticipated delays in regulatory approval, supply chain challenges, disruptions due to COVID-19, competitive pressures, and regulatory developments, among other developments. To the extent that its current resources are insufficient to satisfy its cash requirements, Eos may need to seek additional equity or debt financing. If the financing is not available, or if the terms of financing are less desirable than Eos expects, Eos may be forced to decrease its level of investment in product development or scale back its operations, which could have an adverse impact on its business and financial prospects.
On January 10, 2020, Eos entered into a one-year invoice securitization facility (the “LSQ Invoice Purchase Agreement Facility”) pursuant to (i) an Invoice Purchase Agreement (the “IPA”), as sellers, (the “Seller”), and LSQ Funding Group, L.C. (“LSQ”), as purchaser (the “Purchaser”). Under the terms of the IPA, Eos contributes certain invoices, related collections and security interests (collectively, the “Invoices”) to LSQ on a revolving basis. Under the terms of the IPA, Eos issues to the Purchasers an ownership interest in the Invoices for up to $3.5 million in cash proceeds. The proceeds are used to finance LSQ’s purchase of the Invoices from Eos terminated this facility in September 2020.
The following table summarizes its cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the periods presented.
|Nine Months Ended |
|Fiscal Year Ended|
|($ in thousands)||2020||2019||2019||2018|
|Net cash used in operating activities||$||(10,421||)||$||(20,763||)||$||(23,834||)||$||(24,918||)|
|Net cash used in investing activities||(3,400||)||(1,858||)||(2,900||)||(1,697||)|
|Net cash provided by financing activities||19,493||17,637||22,098||30,075|
Cash flows from operating activities:
Eos’s cash flows used in operating activities to date have been primarily comprised of costs related to research and development, manufacturing of its initial energy storage products, and other general and administrative activities. As Eos continues towards commercial production, Eos expects its expenses related to personnel, manufacturing, research and development and general and administrative activities to increase.
Net cash used in operating activities was $10.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 which is comprised of its net loss of $45.3 million, adjusted for non-cash interest expense on its convertible debt of $23.4 million and other non-cash charges that includes provision for firm purchase agreements of $5.8 million, depreciation and amortization of $1.1 million, and change in fair value of embedded derivative of ($1.7) million. The net cash flows inflow from to changes in operating assets and liabilities was $5.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, primarily driven by a decrease in accounts receivable from the sale of its state tax attributes of $4.1 million and an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $5.1 million.
Net cash used in operating activities was $20.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 which is comprised of its net loss of $60.7 million, adjusted for non-cash interest expense on its convertible debt of $30.9 million, change in fair value of embedded derivative of $1.5 million and other non-cash charges that includes depreciation and amortization of $1.8 million, impairment of property and equipment of $1.6 million and other non-cash charges of ($0.1) million. The net cash flows outflow from to changes in operating assets and liabilities was $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, primarily related to an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Net cash used in operating activities was $23.8 million for the year-ended December 31, 2019, which is comprised of its net loss of $79.5 million, adjusted for non-cash interest expense on its convertible debt of $49.7 million and other non-cash charges that includes depreciation and amortization of $2.1 million, change in fair value of embedded derivative of $0.7 million, impairment of property and equipment of $1.6 million loss on extinguishment of convertible notes — related party of $6.1 million and other non-cash charges of $0.2 million. The net cash flows outflow from changes in operating assets and liabilities was $5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily related to an increase in accounts receivable from the sale of its state tax attributes of $4.1 million and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $1.1 million.
Net cash used in operating activities was $24.9 million for the year-ended December 31, 2018 which is comprised of its net loss of $28.5 million, adjusted for non-cash charges of $4.0 million related primarily to depreciation and amortization and the impairment of property and equipment. The net cash flow outflow from changes in operating assets and liabilities was $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Cash flows from investing activities:
Eos’s cash flows from investing activities, have been comprised primarily of purchases of property and equipment. Capital expenditures totaled $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. Capital expenditures totaled $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
In August 2019, Eos began to make investments in the HI-POWER joint venture, which has the exclusive rights to manufacture its battery systems in North America, subject to meeting certain performance targets. Eos’s initial financial commitment to this joint venture is $4.1 million in the form of cash and special purpose manufacturing equipment. During the latter half of 2019, Eos made cash contributions of $0.6 million to HI-POWER and made additional contributions of $1.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The special purpose manufacturing equipment will be classified as property and equipment on its balance sheet until it is fully commissioned and operational and has produced the first ten megawatts per hour of commercial product.
Cash flows from financing activities:
Through September 30, 2020, Eos has financed its operations primarily through the sale of common and preferred units and convertible notes.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $19.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and included proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes of $8.8 million and the issuance of preferred units of $9.3 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $17.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and included proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes of $17.4 million and the issuance of preferred units of $1.3 million. These proceeds were offset by a cash outflow related to the repayment of short-term notes payable of $1.0 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $22.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and included proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes payable — related party of $19.3 million, and proceeds of $2.1 million attributable to the issuance of contingently redeemable preferred units. These proceeds were offset by a cash outflow related to the repayment of short-term notes payable of $1.0 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $30.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 and included proceeds from the issuance of preferred units of $24.9 million, convertible notes of $4.3 million and short-term notes payable of $1.0 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As a part of its working capital management, Eos sold certain grant receivables and state net operating losses through the LSQ Invoice Purchase Agreement Facility off-balance sheet arrangement described in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section. This facility was terminated in September 2020. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, Eos sold $4.1 million of state tax attributes and $1.5 million of grant receivables under the invoice purchase agreement. Costs incurred on the sale was $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. These amounts are recorded in interest expense in the statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, Eos did not have any off balance sheet receivables outstanding nor did Eos incur any costs associated with off-balance sheet arrangements. Eos did not have any other material off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
Eos’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In preparing its consolidated financial statements, Eos makes assumptions, judgments, and estimates on historical experience and various other factors that Eos believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Eos regularly reevaluates its assumptions, judgments, and estimates.
Eos’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1, “Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Notes to the audited financial statements. Eos’s most significant accounting policies, which reflect significant management estimates and judgment in determining amounts reported in its audited financial statements were as follows:
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The Company capitalizes inventory costs when, based on management’s judgment, future commercialization is considered probable and the future economic benefit is expected to be realized; otherwise, such costs are expensed as research and development. Inventory is evaluated for impairment periodically for excess, obsolescence and for instances where the inventory cost basis in excess of its estimated net realizable value. In estimating a provision for excess, obsolete and slow-moving inventory, Eos considers such factors as competitor offerings, market conditions and the life cycle of the product. If inventory on-hand is determined to be excess, obsolete or has a carrying amount that exceeds its net realizable value, Eos will reduce the carrying amount to its estimated net realizable value.
In preparation with the launch of its next generation energy storage solution, Eos will begin building inventory levels based on its forecast for demand. A significant decrease in demand could result in an increase in the amount of excess inventory on hand, which could lead to additional charges for excess and obsolete inventory.
Convertible Notes Payable
Eos record conventional convertible debt in accordance ASC 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options. Conventional convertible debt is a financial instrument in which the holder may only realize the value of the conversion option by exercising the option and receiving the entire proceeds in a fixed number of shares or the equivalent amount of cash. Convertible instruments that are not bifurcated as a derivative, and not accounted for as a separate equity component under the cash conversion guidance are evaluated to determine whether their conversion prices create an embedded beneficial conversion feature at inception, or may become beneficial in the future due to potential adjustments. A beneficial conversion feature is deemed to be a nondetachable conversion feature that is “in-the-money” at the commitment date. The in-the-money portion, also known as the intrinsic value of the option, is recorded in equity, with an offsetting discount to the carrying amount of convertible debt to which it is attached. The intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature within its convertible debt, including amortization related to the debt discount recorded in connection with a beneficial conversion feature, was not material to its audited financial statements.
The convertible notes issued during 2020 and 2019 contained an embedded derivative feature that could accelerate the repayment of the convertible notes upon either a qualified financing event or the noteholders’ put exercise. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, embedded derivative liabilities with initial fair value of $0.4 and $0.6 were recognized, respectively. As of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the embedded derivatives were classified as current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet and had fair values of $0.4 million and $1.7 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, a change in fair value of embedded derivative gain of $1.7 million and a loss of $1.5 million has been recognized, respectively.
We design, manufacture, and deploy reliable, sustainable, safe and scalable low-cost battery storage solutions for the electric utility industry. Our flagship product is the Eos Znyth® DC battery system (the “Eos Znyth® system”), with both front of the meter and behind the meter applications. The Eos Znyth® system is the first stationary battery energy storage system (“BESS”) that is competitive with lithium-ion (“Li-ion”) in both price and performance, fully recyclable, does not require any rare earth or conflict materials, and is commercially available and scalable. Stationary BESS’s are used to store energy for many purposes, including stabilizing and reducing congestion of the power grid and reducing peak energy usage. When coupled with renewable energy sources such as photovoltaic (“PV”) solar and wind generation, the Eos Znyth® system can store the energy that the renewable is producing and discharge it when the renewable is not producing energy, thus increasing the value of the renewable. Additionally, storage is used by commercial and industrial customers to save energy costs by reducing their peak usage thus reducing the transmission and distribution charges from utilities. We believe that energy storage serves as a central catalyst for modernizing and creating a more reliable and resilient, efficient, sustainable, and affordable grid.
EES LLC was founded in 2008 under the name Grid Storage Technologies, initially focusing on devolving the chemistry of its proprietary electrolyte-based battery technology and improving mechanical design and system performance. Our products, which are manufactured and developed in the United States, have the ability to play a pivotal role in the transition to a more sustainable, resilient and low carbon energy future. We are transitioning from an organization that focused primarily on research and development to one focused on commercialization of our energy storage solution and a scaled manufacturing platform. We produced our first proof of concept with generation 1 of the Eos Znyth® system in 2015 (“Gen 1”) and began commercial shipments of our generation 2 Eos Znyth® system in 2018 (“Gen 2”). As of August 2, 2020, we delivered approximately ten Eos Znyth® systems comprised of over 2,500 Znyth® batteries or approximately 5MWh. Each Eos Znyth® system, which includes multiple battery formations and averages 250 batteries per system, is currently connected to, and monitored through, its battery management system. Each system is individually designed with the appropriate number of batteries to achieve the end user’s desired energy needs.
The Eos Znyth® system uses our Znyth® technology, a patented aqueous zinc-powered battery technology that offers a safe, scalable, fully recyclable and sustainable alternative to lithium-ion battery power. The Znyth® technology requires just five core commodity materials that are derived from non-rare earth and non-conflict minerals that are Earth abundant and fully recyclable. The Eos Znyth® system is also non-flammable and does not require any moving parts or pumps, allowing for simple maintenance and low-cost operation. Our competitive advantage is its Znyth® battery technology, which employs a unique zinc-halide oxidation/reduction cycle packaged in a sealed, flooded, bipolar battery.
The Eos Znyth® system offers an alternative to Li-ion at a cost per kilowatt hour (“KWh”) that is competitive. Unlike Li-ion, our commodity based aqueous zinc chemistry does not require high-cost heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems (“HVAC”) or fire suppression equipment due to our wide operating temperature range. Eos Znyth® is manufactured with no toxic chemicals, which limits risk of catastrophic failure. Li-ion batteries have a history of explosions and fires, which are not an issue for our systems due to the stable, non-combustible chemistry used in our batteries. Our raw materials and components are readily available commodities with fewer supply constraints than competing technologies and are environmentally benign. Li-ion batteries use scarce, toxic rare earth materials that can be in short supply due to their use in electric vehicles, mobile phones and an array of other electronics. Our technology is highly scalable, easily installed and integrated into new or existing electric infrastructure. It also includes our proprietary battery management system, which optimizes our battery performance and protects the health and longevity of the battery. Our products are currently manufactured in the United States using a highly automated assembly line, which requires a fraction of the capital expenditure of equivalent Li-ion manufacturing processes. Our scalable manufacturing platform can be localized anywhere in the world in less than twelve months. Our technology is protected by a robust patent portfolio, with over 140 patents pending, issued or published in thirty-three (33) countries.
We sell our products through our direct sales force and through sales channels to developers, power producers, large utilities and commercial and industrial companies. Our sales focus is on use cases that require three (3) to ten (10) hours of battery storage, although our battery can be used for shorter durations as well. We are establishing a global sales presence by leveraging our sales channels and direct sales team. We work with customers to understand the use case for each battery storage project and proposes the best solution to maximize the economics for the end-user. Examples of customers and use cases for our systems include:
|●||Solar developers combine battery storage with solar fields to time shift energy by charging the battery during the day and then using the battery during peak hours, just after sundown.|
|●||Industrial customers use battery storage to improve power quality and improve the efficiency of other energy sources.|
|●||Commercial customers in urban areas utilize indoor battery storage to safely reduce the demand charges from their utility and to participate in utility programs designed to allow the grid to perform better.|
|●||Utilities use battery storage systems to offset or postpone capital expenditures, which improves the reliability of the power grid.|
Our customers include leading renewable power producers, large utilities, developers and industrial companies such as NextEra Energy, Inc. (“NextEra Energy”), International Electric Power, LLC (“IEP”), Carson Hybrid Energy Storage, LLC (“CHES”) Hecate Energy LLC (“Hecate Energy”), Royal Dutch Shell plc (“Shell”), Duke Energy Corporation (“Duke Energy”), Pattern Energy Group LP and (“Pattern Energy”). We also sell to key system integrators and retail companies such as Siemens AG and Statkraft AS.
Additionally, our joint venture partner Holtec International (“Holtec”), a multi-billion dollar supplier to the nuclear power industry, is looking to “repower” decommissioned nuclear plants with renewable energy sources and battery storage. By using wind and solar energy sources combined with storage this creates a base load capable power plant that will be sold to the utilities. In addition, we are in discussions with other partners to do the same for coal plants that are in the process of closing. Repowering such plants requires a BESS with a flexible discharge duration of three to ten hours, the ability to cycle daily and provide a 100% discharge, and an energy output that does not degrade lower than 70% during its product lifetime. The Eos Znyth® system meets all such requirements and we believe is well suited for this application.
We believe that energy storage is on the verge of global wide scale deployment. As batteries increasingly become economical on a levelized cost of energy basis, we believe that utility-scale battery technology will be increasingly beneficial for a variety of solutions, including solar PV plus storage, peaking capacity, grid congestion and wind generation plus storage. We anticipate rapid increases in utility scale co-located renewable energy plus storage projects, especially in the United States, with most near and medium-term installation qualifying as utility scale. The reason for the increase is that combining a battery with an intermittent renewable energy source, such as wind or solar, allows for the storage of energy in the battery that can used when the intermittent source is not available, for example if the wind is not blowing or the sun is not shining.
According to Bloomberg New Energy Finance (“BNEF”) the global energy storage market is expected to grow to a cumulative 1,095 gigawatts (“GW”), attracting an estimated $660 billion in future investment by 2040. Based on BNEF, we believe the United States would represent over 15% of this global market. Approximately 3.3 GW of energy storage was commissioned globally in 2019, which is expected to increase to 4.7 GW in 2020 according BNEF. In addition, according to BNEF, over 1.9 GW of new utility-scale energy storage was announced in 2019. A significant factor in increased demand for energy storage, estimated to increase to 27% by 2030, is accelerating proliferation of renewable energy globally and in the United States. According to BNEF, the percentage of renewable energy in total electricity generation in the United States will change from 18% in 2019 to 36% by 2030 and solar energy is estimated to contribute 20% of total electricity supply. Favorable regulatory conditions such as the recent court decision validating FERC Order 841, along with state sponsored incentives in New York, California, Massachusetts and other states coupled with the rapid growth of solar PV plus storage applications throughout the United States are expected to grow the utility-scale energy storage market from 172 megawatts (“MW”) / 345 megawatt hours (“MWh”) in 2019 to 6,631 MW / 17,563 MWh by 2025. Based on management’s estimates, we estimate 1,250 GW of additional capacity from renewables to be delivered to the grid by 2024, leading to an increased demand for energy storage. Globally, over the same period, we expect the energy storage market to grow at a 53% compound annual growth rate from 6,480 MWh in 2019 to approximately 83,000 MWh by 2025. Below is a demonstration of the projected energy storage global market and the projected annual investment in the energy storage global market by region:
Limitations of Existing Technologies
Li-ion is the most prevalent incumbent energy storage technology, historically used in consumer electronics, electric vehicles and select transportation industries, and is the primary competition to the Eos systems. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Li-ion accounted for 93% of all new energy storage capacity in the United States since 2012, growing at an annual rate of 55%. According to the Lazard Levelized Cost of Storage Version 4.0 Final report (“Lazard LCOS 4.0 Report”), Li-ion has an optimal MW capacity of between 5 kilowatts (“kW”) — 100 MW and an anticipated useful life of ten (10) years. The two primary ingredients for Li-ion batteries are lithium and cobalt.
Due to the factors described below, we believe that even though lithium supplies are generally forecasted to accommodate the global increase in demand in the near term, supply chains will likely become strained over time. Additionally, cobalt faces significant supply chain uncertainty that may constrain Li-ion battery growth.
|●||Lithium Supply. The supply chain is highly concentrated, and according to an article by McKinsey & Company titled “Lithium and Cobalt: A tale of two commodities” (“McKinsey Article”) only eight (8) countries are producing lithium globally, of which Chile, Australia and China accounted for 85% of production in 2017. Only four companies — Talison Lithium Pty Ltd, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A., Albemarle Corporation and FMC Corporation — control the majority of the global mining output. Without the addition of new lithium mining projects and with the growing lithium demand, especially in the electric vehicle space, demand may exceed supply thus hindering the growth of lithium based products.|
|●||Cobalt Supply. According to the McKinsey Article, while the top three producers of cobalt comprise only 40% of the global cobalt supply, regional suppliers are more monopolistic with the Democratic Republic of the Congo (“DRC”) representing approximately 70% of global output in 2017 and is projected to increase. The DRC historically experienced supply disruptions and is currently revising mining laws, with additional concerns regarding child labor that threaten the market’s overall growth. Additionally, approximately 90% of the global cobalt supply is produced as a by-product from either copper or nickel mining, making cobalt expansion projects closely tied to the economics of these markets. Global forecasts for cobalt production show supply shortages arising as early as 2022, which would likely slow Li-ion battery growth.|
|●||Electric Vehicle (“EV”) Demand. Both the lithium and cobalt markets have been largely driven by battery demand, primarily from consumer electronics, representing 40% and 25% of demand in 2017, respectively. Lithium and Cobalt could face supply constraints due to the demand for these materials in batteries for the EV industry. As the global EV market expands, Eos expects global demand for lithium to increase. EVs represented 1.3% of global vehicle sales in 2017, but McKinsey & Company forecasts that EVs will represent 5% of the global market by 2020. The proportion of Li-ion batteries consumed by the EV industry was 64% in 2019 and is forecasted to grow to 80% by 2030.|
Li-ion also suffers from certain inherent technological limitations. The life cycle can be limited under harsh conditions, due to the need for HVAC to keep the battery temperatures around 25C. Li-ion is also challenging to pair with solar in areas where the grid is not stable, which limits their usage in many locations around the world. Li-ion can be susceptible to overheating, explosions and related safety issues, such as the April 2019 lithium battery explosion near Phoenix Arizona. Most urban areas restrict the use of commercial size Li-ion batteries in buildings. Finally, Li-ion technology is difficult to recycle and dispose because it contains toxic materials.
There are a number of additional battery technologies utilized in the energy storage industry, such as:
|●||Flow Battery. Flow batteries store energy by chemically changing the electrolyte (vanadium) or by plating zinc (zinc bromide). According to the Lazard LCOS 4.0 Report, flow batteries have an optimal MW capacity of between 25 kW — 100 MW and an anticipated useful life of twenty (20) years. While flow batteries typically have minimal storage capacity degradation and limited potential for fire, they require expensive components and comparatively high balance of system costs. Specifically, the raw materials are expensive, and the cost of operations and maintenance is very high. Flow batteries also have reduced efficiency due to high mechanical losses, and high maintenance requirements. They require massive scale to reach competitive cost points and, along with the above, limit applications to niche markets.|
|●||Lead-Acid. Lead-acid batteries are the most commonly utilized battery storage technology, and are the primary battery utilized in automotive vehicles. The Lazard LCOS 4.0 Report notes that they have an optimal MW capacity of 1 — 100+ MW and an anticipated useful life of between three and five years. Furthermore, while lead-acid batteries are relatively low cost and can be utilized for multiple purposes, they have a poor depth of discharge, short lifespan, low energy density and a large footprint as compared to other technologies.|
The Eos Solution
Our battery systems offer a safe, sustainable and scalable alternative to Li-ion at a lower Levelized Cost of Storage (“LCOS”). Our solution consists of the Eos Znyth® system, which integrates Eos Znyth® batteries in a modular, outdoor-rated enclosure, in Eos’s Powerhouse or in modular, customized racks for indoor urban storage.
The key benefits of our solution include:
|●||Peak Shifting and Demand Management. Our multi-cycle DC Znyth® system shifts power to peak hours, with efficiency performance at 100% depth of discharge. Li-ion typically limits the depth of discharge to 80-90% due to the impact on accelerating the lithium battery degradation. Additionally, based on our management estimates, even at 80% depth of discharge Li-ion battery is expected to lose 2.5% of energy storage capacity per year over its lifetime, compared with 1.8% for our product, resulting in a more favorable degradation curve with estimated operating expense savings at $3 kWh per year. Utilities and end use customers can use our batteries to store excess efficient base-load generation and renewable energy produced during off peak hours. By discharging during peak hours, we obviate the need for new dirty, inefficient peaking generation, and reduces carbon emissions. Additionally, utilities can use the peak shifting to postpone or eliminate capital investment, and the end-user can reduce its demand charges from the utility.|
|●||Low Maintenance and Minimal Auxiliary Load. Our battery system does not require an HVAC or fire suppression system, resulting in lower expenses associated with operating the battery. This in turn brings significant cost savings to our customers, resulting in a meaningful return on investment in our storage product and an approximately 30% reduction in levelized cost of storage. HVAC system usually represents 8% of delivered energy for Li-ion storage systems, compared with 1.5% for our product, resulting in operating expense savings at of $2 kWh per year, based on our management’s estimates. Additionally, given that our battery does not require auxiliary electricity load needed to support an HVAC and fire suppression systems, it is able to ride through grid outages, resulting in more reliable energy storage. Comparatively, li-on cannot operate without grid power, due to its auxiliary load.|
|●||Solar/Wind Integration and Shifting. Renewables such as wind and solar are intermittent, potentially introducing instability into the electric grid and limiting their viability as a firm, dispatchable power source. Our batteries allow utilities and consumers to smooth production and time shift renewable energy. Through the use of our batteries, solar electricity produced at noon can be stored and deployed as a stable power source at peak demand later in the afternoon.|
|●||Ancillary Services. Our batteries can be used to bring revenue to its commercial and industrial customers through their participation in the demand response and ancillary markets. The demand response markets are used by utilities to offset grid congestion at certain locations by paying end users for reducing their energy use during congested periods. The ancillary markets are used to stabilize and keep the grid in balance, and end users are paid to either inject energy into the grid or receive power from the grid, thus providing the balance. Our batteries are eligible for entry into demand response and ancillary electricity markets that provide stability to the power grid.|
|●||Performs Across Wide Temperature Range. Our system’s performance is stable from -11º to 45ºC without HVAC and recovers performance after extreme temperatures as high as 70º to 90ºC, which would cause Li-ion to experience thermal runaway and explosion. Data from our cell, battery and system testing shows that round trip efficiency (“RTE”) is stable within 78%+/- 3% RTE across -11º to 41ºC. (round trip efficiency is the ratio of energy put in (in KWh) to energy retrieved from storage (in KWh). Below is a demonstration of the wide temperature operating range of our battery technology:|
|●||The Eos system is also resilient, recovering after extreme temperature abuse as high as 90ºC. This is an improvement to li-on that requires HVAC and fire suppression, thus increasing capital expenditures required for maintenance. Based on management’s estimates, our low maintenance capabilities result in approximately $1 kWh per year operating expense savings. Below is a demonstration of an our battery that was subjected to temperatures exceeding 90ºC. After the battery was allowed to cool, the battery was able to return to its pre-abuse performance.|
|●||Upside Opportunities. Given that raw materials represent a high percentage of the Eos Znyth® system’s total cost, We expect the salvage value of the raw materials will offset system removal and decommissioning at the end of life for its customers. We continue to evaluate and refine recycling cost and estimates that its battery system will have 50% of its original capacity after thirty (30) years of use. We anticipate development of a secondary, after-life market for its batteries in approximately 10 years, which may generate additional revenue for customers or offset other costs.|
Our Competitive Strengths
Our key competitors are principally traditional Li-ion battery manufacturers, such as Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, LG Chem, Ltd., Sungrow and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited. We believe the following strengths of our business distinguish us from our competitors and position us to capitalize on the expected continued growth in the energy storage market:
|●||Differentiated Product. Lithium cells must be kept within a narrow temperature range (25°C +/- 3°C), otherwise they are at risk of thermal runaway, leading to fire or explosion. The Eos Znyth® system has a significantly wider thermal operating range (-20°C to 45°C) and eliminates costly thermal management measures such as HVAC cooling systems and fire suppression systems. Our battery system is able to charge and discharge at different durations, depending on battery’s use cases; for li-on, the charge and discharge rates are fixed, and they can degrade the life of battery if not used as rated.|
|●||No Supply Chain Constraints. All materials for producing the Eos Znyth® system are widely available commodities with no supply chain constraints and no competition with EVs. Additionally, all materials are fully recyclable at end of product life, which result in net present value savings of $4 kWh. Comparatively, li-on battery systems have recyclable components, resulting in $8/kWh disposable costs based on management’s estimates.|
|●||Proven Technology Solution in the Growing Energy Storage Market. We delivered 4,900 kWh worth of our systems to customers in 2019. As we prepare to launch the Znyth® Gen 2.3 product and ramp manufacturing to gigawatt-hours (“GWh”) scale, we believe that we will benefit from the overall growth of the energy storage market, which as projected by BNEF to reach 1,095 GWh by 2040.|
|●||Experienced Technology Team Focused on Continuous Innovation. We successfully introduced three generations of energy storage systems in three years (Gen1, Gen 2, and Gen 2.3) and plan to release new generations in the coming years. Gen 1 and Gen 2 were pilot systems that provided us with the experience to optimize the performance and design of Gen 2.3. Our research and development team is responsible for its portfolio of fourteen (14) patent families with over 140 patents pending, issued or published in thirty-three (33) countries, protecting its technology and system architecture. We believe that our continued investment in Research and Development will enable us to continue to increase efficiency, functionality, and reliability while reducing the cost of its solution.|
|●||Established Global Sales Channels Anchored with Top Tier Customers. We sell our products directly and through sales channel partners to the electric utility industry, as well as commercial and industrial users. In fiscal year 2019 and the first eight months of fiscal year 2020, we sold our products to approximately 9 customers in 4 countries.|
|●||Strong management team. We assembled an executive team focused on accelerating the commercialization of the next-generation Eos Znyth® solution. With decades of diverse experience in the energy industry and deep expertise in manufacturing, battery storage and executing complex power and energy projects around the world, our management team is able to deliver systems at scale to meet the growing demands of the global storage market.|
Our mission is to accelerate clean energy by developing and deploying battery storage solutions that deliver the reliable and cost-competitive power that the stationary BESS market expects in a sustainable way. Key elements of its strategy include:
|●||Continue to Innovate and Advance Eos Solutions. We intend to continue to innovate its energy storage systems by developing new and enhanced technologies and solutions. Our innovation also extends to its manufacturing ability, which includes a proprietary equipment and process design. We entered into a partnership with Holtec to launch HI-POWER, a joint-venture manufacturing facility in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania with an annual manufacturing capacity of 1 GWhs and with the space to expand its existing factory to manufacture 3.5 GWhs. We believe that its future technology will continue to reduce cost and improve the efficiency and competitiveness of its offerings. We plan to continue to introduce new generations of our technologies to increase the adoption of our energy storage systems worldwide.|
|●||Further expand its products and services. By early 2021, we intend to offer remote asset monitoring and optimization services to track battery performance and health and to proactively identify future system performance. We intend to continue to expand our software functionality by including an onsite controller that integrates with the power control system (inverter) and can be remotely controlled and managed to ensure that the battery system is optimized for performance and the best economic return. Specifically, we will incorporate machine learning, artificial intelligence, data science and optimization algorithms to enable use cases and create the greatest value to the end user.|
|●||Further expand project related services. We offer to customers the following project related services:|
|●||Project management. We offer customers project management services to ensure the process of implementing our battery is managed in conjunction with the overall project plans. We will oversee the entire project from end to end. We charge the customer depending on the scope of our involvement.|
|●||Commissioning of the battery system. We commission our battery system and charge the customer for the commissioning services. The commissioning service ensures that our battery is providing the performance and operations that were committed to the customer.|
|●||Operations and Maintenance. We offer to our customers operational and maintenance plans to keep our battery in top performance. This consists of both remote monitoring of the battery health and performance as well as periodic onsite visits to perform routine maintenance.|
We plan to expand its resources and capabilities to meet our customers’ needs. This expansion will include adding employees to perform the work, as well as contracting and certifying qualified third parties to perform the commissioning and operations and maintenance services.
|●||Leverage our partnerships to produce Znyth® batteries at scale. We partnered with Holtec to produce Znyth® batteries and Znyth® DC battery systems at GWh scale as part of the HI-POWER joint venture. As the U.S. market grows, HI-POWER expects to expand its manufacturing capacity in the United States, utilizing Holtec’s Manufacturing Division facility outside of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.|
|●||Implement near-term cost reduction. We intend to optimize manufacturing for the Gen 2.3 by insourcing selected services and further automation of the manufacturing process. Through its continued research and development efforts, We also believe we can continue to reduce the amount and cost of material required to manufacture the batteries. We also plan to substitute new materials to reduce the current cost. We believe it will achieve lower prices for some battery material through volume purchasing.|
The Eos Znyth® system is designed to meet a wide range of requirements in the battery storage industry, including very large grid-scale energy storage projects, large and small solar projects, commercial or industrial projects, in-building urban projects or, while not currently part of its medium-term strategy, the residential market. With a three (3) to ten (10) hour discharge capability, immediate response time, and modular construction, the Eos Znyth® system can be scaled and configured to reduce cost and maximize profitability in a wide range of battery storage projects. While the Eos Znyth® system can be implemented in any configuration required, we offer three standard configurations: the Energy BlockTM (“Energy Block”), the Powerhouse and Customized racks.
Our innovative Energy Block packaging is a twenty (20) foot standard International Organization for Standardization shipping container and enables flexible options for system installation while significantly lowering the installation cost and accelerating permitting and installation time. The Energy Block is shipped with batteries and all electrical equipment integrated into a standard twenty (20) foot intermodal shipping container for drop and play convenience. Each sub-system includes pre-integrated strings of Eos Znyth® batteries with DC wiring, DC system protection, support structure, enclosure and our battery management system. The Energy Block system integrates Eos Znyth® batteries in a modular, outdoor-rated enclosure capable of delivering three (3) to ten (10) hours of continuous discharge at specified power. Each DC system is made-up of a containerized Energy Block integrating 144 Znyth® Batteries and DC Control Cabinet. Each Energy Block is connected by a central DC Control Cabinet and is outfitted with our proprietary battery management system that monitors the voltage and temperature of each battery in the system, isolates faulty battery strings and provides real time visibility of battery operating limits. Energy Block is typically purchased by commercial and industrial customers and solar developers and is typically used for 40MWh and smaller battery systems, but can be used for larger systems as well.
The Powerhouse is designed for large battery storage projects by allowing for what we believe to be the highest power density in the smallest footprint. The Powerhouse is a pole barn type structure with a racking system that allows the modular Znyth® batteries to be stacked up to twelve (12) batteries high, thus providing increased power density. Because the Znyth® battery does not require HVAC or fire suppression systems and is simple to install, operate and maintain as compared to Li-ion. We believe the Powerhouse provides a cost-effective way to implement large Znyth® battery storage systems. Furthermore, Powerhouse is typically purchased by utilities, independent power producers, solar and wind developers, and is typically used for larger systems above 40MWh.
Indoor Urban customized racks are modular configured racks offered primarily for indoor battery storage projects but could be used in a wide range of projects. The safety and modular nature of the Znyth® battery allows for implementations in basements, rooftops, or any number of other locations in a building. Currently, most safety and fire codes only allow Li-ion batteries to be utilized outdoors in urban environments. Customized racks are typically purchased by commercial and industrial customers and are typically used for indoor systems that require a modular configuration.
Our largest customer in fiscal year 2019 was Duke Energy, which accounted for 26.1% of our revenues in fiscal 2019. Other customers include utilities, developers and industrial companies such as NextEra Energy, IEP, CHES, Hecate Energy, Shell and Pattern Energy.
The success of our business depends, in part, on our ability to maintain and protect its proprietary technologies, information, processes and know-how. We rely primarily on patent, trademark, copyright and trade secrets laws in the United States and similar laws in other countries, confidentiality agreements and procedures and other contractual arrangements to protect our technology. We are in the process of filing, or have recently filed, certain patents relative to our Gen 2.3 product that are subject to USPTO approval. A majority of our patents relate to cell chemistry, architecture and battery mechanical design, system packaging and battery management systems. We continually assess opportunities to seek patent protection for those aspects of its technology, designs and methodologies and processes that we believe provide significant competitive advantages. As of September 30, 2020, we had fourteen (14) patent families with over 140 patents pending, issued, or published in thirty-three (33) countries, protecting our technology and system architecture. Our issued patents are scheduled to expire between years 2035 and 2036.
We rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to safeguard our interests with respect to proprietary know-how that is not patentable and processes for which patents are difficult to enforce. We believe that many key elements of our manufacturing processes involve proprietary know-how, technology or data that are not covered by patents or patent applications, including technical processes, test equipment designs, algorithms and procedures.
All of our research and development personnel have entered into confidentiality and proprietary information agreements with us. These agreements address intellectual property protection issues and require our employees to assign to us all of the inventions, designs and technologies the personnel develop during the course of employment.
We also require our customers and business partners to enter into confidentiality agreements before we disclose any sensitive aspects of our technology or business plans.
The markets for our products are competitive, and we compete with manufacturers of traditional Li-ion and other battery storage systems. The principal areas in which it competes with other companies include:
|●||product performance and features;|
|●||safety and sustainability|
|●||total lifetime cost of ownership;|
|●||total product lifespan;|
|●||power and energy efficiency;|
|●||customer service and support; and|
|●||U.S. based manufacturing and sourced materials.|
Eos’s Znyth® system competes principally with products from traditional Li-ion battery manufacturers such as Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, LG Chem, Ltd., Sungrow and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited. We believe that its Znyth® battery based system offers significant technology, safety and cost advantages that reflect a competitive differentiation over traditional energy storage technologies.
In the United States and Puerto Rico, geographic distribution of energy storage deployment has been driven by regulatory policy with both federal and state level programs contributing to stable revenue streams for energy storage. Such policies include:
|●||Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. FERC Order 841 requires eligibility for energy storage in wholesale, capacity and ancillary services markets. FERC Order 841 allows each regional transmission organization and independent system operator to establish its own rules and guidelines for integrating energy storage resources, but does specify that the guidelines must allow storage resources to provide all the services it is technically capable of providing. According to BNEF, markets being enabled by FERC Order 841 may spur the United States back to the top of global storage deployments in 2020, with a projected 24% share of global installations.|
|●||California. California is expected to lead front-of-the-meter energy storage deployments through 2023, mainly driven by Assembly Bill 2514 procurement targets and investor-owned utilities procuring storage for capacity applications. The California Public Utilities Commission mandated utilities to procure up to 500 MW of behind the meter (“BTM”) storage. Further, growth in California is driven by Demand Response Auction Mechanism, which creates economic incentives for distributed energy resources to offer their services to utilities and grid energy markets. The California independent systems operator allows wholesale market participation for BTM storage assets which can earn capacity payments and provide ancillary services.|
|●||Massachusetts. Massachusetts set an energy storage procurement target of 1,000 MWh by 2025. The advancing Commonwealth Energy Storage program awarded $20 million in grants which directly supported 32 MW of BTM storage capacity to date. The Solar Massachusetts Renewable Target program calls for 1,600 MW of PV, and includes significant adders if paired with storage. The Peak Demand Reduction Grant Program is a $4.7 million Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources initiative designed to test strategies for reducing Massachusetts’ energy usage at times of peak demand.|
|●||New York. New York set an energy storage target of 1,500 MW by 2025 (3,000 MW by 2030), 500 MW of which will be commercial and industrial. $400 million in state funding is available for energy storage projects. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority must distribute $350 million in market acceleration incentives for energy storage, including for solar plus storage projects to jump start activity and allow projects to access federal tax credits in the near term. NY Green Bank has announced $200 million in financing support for energy storage.|
|●||Other. The Midwest, New England, Pacific Northwest states and Puerto Rico have taken the early charge on front-of-the-meter energy storage adoption in the “all others” market category, although Eos anticipates that states such as Minnesota and Florida, as well as areas in the Southwest Power Pool and Midcontinent Independent System Operator, will emerge further over the next five years. Puerto Rico, with its latest draft integrated resource plan, could lead this market over the next four years if it moves forward with its mini-grid proposal. Still in the proposal phase, Arizona’s commissioner chose a 3 GW energy storage target to be achieved by 2030 and also called for a Clean Peak Target which increases clean resources deployed during peak times by 1.5% per year until 2030. Under Executive Order 28, the New Jersey Energy Master Plan calls for 600 MW of energy storage by 2021 and 2,000 MW by 2030. In Nevada, Senate Bill 204 requires the public utilities commission of Nevada to investigate and establish targets for certain electric utilities to procure energy storage systems while Senate Bill 145 establishes an incentive program for behind-the-meter energy storage within the state’s solar program. In Hawaii, Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. recently announced 262 MW of storage across three islands, further establishing its position as a leading market. Missouri and Louisiana are also expected to issue orders supporting new utility demand response programs.|
The U.S. Congress is considering a variety of proposals for tax incentives that will benefit the energy storage industry, including in the form of tax credits. IRS private letter ruling 201809003 clarified that energy storage is eligible for federal tax credits if charted primarily by qualifying renewable resources. Proposals that have or are being considered by Congress include: (i) the establishment of an investment tax credit for business and home use of energy storage; (ii) the creation of a 30% investment tax credit for refueling costs and qualified nuclear power plant capital expenditures for each taxable year through 2023, thereafter declining each year until it reaches 10% in 2026; (iii) extension of the federal solar energy investment tax credit for ten (10) more years, keeping the credit at 30% through 2029; (iv) the consolidation of forty-four (44) federal energy tax incentives into three provisions to award credits for clean electricity, lower-emitting transportation fuels and energy efficient offices and homes; (v) the allowance of renewable electricity production and investment tax credits to be transferred on a limited basis to any entity involved in a renewable energy project, regardless of whether they have taxable income; and (vi) the extension of the production tax credit for energy produced from closed and open-loop biomass, geothermal, landfill gas, trash, qualified hydro and marine an hydrokinetic facilities to facilities that began construction by the end of 2019. There can be no assurance that all or any of the above proposals will be adopted by the U.S. Congress.
As of September 30, 2020, we had sixty-seven (67) employees with sixty-six (66) full-time employees and one (1) part-time employee. Of these full-time employees, thirty-nine (39) were engaged in research and development, three (3) in sales and marketing, fifteen (15) in operations and support and nine (9) in general and administrative capacities.
None of our employees are represented by a labor union. We have not experienced any employment-related work stoppages, and we consider relations with our employees to be good.
Our corporate headquarters are located in Edison, New Jersey, in an office consisting of approximately 63,000 square feet of office, testing and product design space. We have a ten (10) year lease on its corporate headquarters, which expires on September 14, 2026.
We believe that our existing properties are in good condition and are sufficient and suitable for the conduct of our business for the foreseeable future. To the extent we need change as our business grows, we expect that additional space and facilities will be available.
From time to time, we may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations. There is no material litigation, arbitration or governmental proceeding currently pending against us or any members of our management team in their capacity as such.
Management and Board of Directors
Our principal officers are Joe Mastrangelo, Chief Executive Officer, Mack Treece, Chief Strategic Alliances Officer and Sagar Kurada, Chief Financial Officer. In addition, following the business combination, Russ Stidolph will serve as Chairman of the Company’s board of directors.
The board of directors of the Company is comprised of seven directors, of which, in accordance with the terms of the Director Nomination Agreement, Daniel Shribman, Mimi Walters and Alex Dimitrief have been nominated by the Sponsor and Russell Stidolph, Joseph Mastrangelo, Krishna Singh and Audrey Zibelman have been nominated by the Seller, respectively.
The following persons with ages as of January 11, 2021 are the executive officers and directors of the Company following the Closing:
|Joe Mastrangelo||52||Chief Executive Officer|
|Sagar Kurada||42||Chief Financial Officer|
|Mack Treece||62||Chief Strategic Alliances Officer|
|Dr. Balakrishnan G. Iyer||46||Chief Commercial Officer|
|Dr. Krishna Singh||73||Director|
|Marian “Mimi” Walters||58||Director|
Joe Mastrangelo, 52, joined Eos as a board advisor in March 2018 and assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer in August, 2019. Before coming to Eos, Mr. Mastrangelo was president and chief executive officer of Gas Power Systems since September 2015. As an energy industry leader for the past two decades, Mr. Mastrangelo has extensive experience leading diverse teams to develop and deploy commercial scale projects around the world. Mr. Mastrangelo has broad operating experience across the energy value chain including serving as Chief Executive Officer of GE’s Power Conversion business, applying science and systems of power conversion to increase the efficiency of the world’s energy infrastructure. Mr. Mastrangelo spent ten years with GE Oil & Gas, in leadership roles in finance, quality, and commercial operations, culminating in being named a GE Corporate Officer in 2008. Joe began his career with GE in the company’s Financial Management Program and then joined GE’s Corporate Audit Staff. Originally from New York, Mr. Mastrangelo earned a Bachelor of Science in Finance from Clarkson University and an Associate of Science, Business Administration and Management from Westchester Community College.
Sagar C. Kurada, 42, joined Eos as Chief Financial Officer in July 2020. In this position, Mr. Kurada is responsible for the overall financial strategy and direction at Eos, overseeing all financial functions, he guides the controller, treasury, shareholder relations, accounting, tax, financial planning and internal audit functions to pursue the Eos’s aggressive growth strategy and meet its clients’ and investors’ expectations. Prior to joining Eos, Mr. Kurada acted as Chief Financial Officer of HighTower Advisors from August 2016 to November 2019. Mr. Kurada also served as Chief Executive Officer of multiple GE operating entities, and worked in the private equity consulting practice at FCM from July 2014 to July 2016. Throughout his 20-year career in financial strategy, planning, accounting, auditing, Mr. Kurada has established a reputation for building world-class teams and for aligning financial and business interests to support business strategy and high-growth. Sagar has led multiple equity and debt financings and raised in excess of $1 billion of capital to support business growth. Mr. Kurada holds a BS in Finance and Technology from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and MBA from Columbia Business School.
Mack Treece, 62, joined Eos as a consultant in March 2019 and assumed the role of Chief Financial Officer in March 2019. In June, 2020 Mr. Treece was appointed Chief Strategic Alliances Officer. Prior to Eos, Mack served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Viridity Energy since November 2012, where he was responsible for all day-to-day operations, including sales, marketing, operations and finance. Mr. Treece has over 25 years of experience in senior management positions, with a specific focus on successfully scaling young companies into dominant market positions. Previously, Mr. Treece was the Chief Executive Officer and co-founder of ConnectFN and was responsible for the overall management and strategic direction of the company. Prior to ConnectFN, Mr. Treece served as President for Teliris where he led the telepresence provider’s Global Sales, Marketing, Finance and Operations. Mr. Treece also held several executive positions with increasing responsibility at Orange Business Services (formerly Equant). Mr. Treece began his career with Bell Atlantic, where he last held the position of Global Chief Financial Officer for Bell Atlantic International Wireless (BAIW) and Senior Vice President for Asia. Mr. Treece has lived and worked abroad as part of global organizations for more than 25 years. He has a B.S. in Finance and Marketing from the University of Virginia and a MBA in International Finance from Widener University.
Dr. Balakrishnan G. Iyer, 46, Dr. Iyer joined Eos on April 19th, 2020. Prior to Eos, Dr. Iyer was Co-founder and Chief Growth Officer of Utopus Insights since April 2017, a New York-based global renewable energy analytics company, recently acquired by Vestas. Dr. Iyer is a seasoned energy and utilities industry management professional, with rich experience driving business development for global conglomerates. Dr. Iyer successfully steered three startups from inception to exit, with investments from some of the largest utilities and financial investors worldwide. Dr. Iyer began his career at Schlumberger in June 1996 and previously served as Chief Operating Officer of Enel Green Power as part of their acquisition of BLP where he worked from July 2012 till April 2017 and as VP, Business Development at GE, where he drove technology developments for renewable energy and smart grid. He worked in GE in various roles from July 2000 till June 2012. Dr. Iyer earned a Master’s in Engineering from Binghamton University in New York, an MBA from New York University (NYU) Stern, and Joint Undergraduate and Master’s Degrees in Mechanical Engineering & Science from Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS) in India. In 2019, Dr. Iyer was conferred with an Honorary Degree of Doctor of Science by his alma mater, Binghamton University, for his contributions to the fields of sustainable energy and inclusive education.
Russell Stidolph, 45, has served as a director since 2014 and the chairman of the board of Eos since 2018. Mr. Stidolph is the founder AltEnergy, LLC a private equity firm focused on alternative energy investing, where he has served as Managing Director since 2006. Prior to forming AltEnergy, Mr. Stidolph was a Principal at J.H. Whitney & Co., LLC a middle-market private equity firm based in New Canaan, Connecticut. While at J.H. Whitney Mr. Stidolph was responsible for starting and developing the firm’s alternative energy investing practice where he was responsible for Hawkeye Renewables, LLC and Iowa Winds, LLC. Mr. Stidolph was both the Chief Financial Officer and Vice Chairman of Hawkeye Renewables, LLC before it was sold in 2006 to Thomas H. Lee Partners, LP. Prior to joining J.H. Whitney, Mr. Stidolph was a member of the corporate finance group at PaineWebber, Inc., that was responsible for high yield and leverage finance origination. Mr. Stidolph also acted as Senior Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer of Tres Amigas, LLC and he still sits on the Company’s Board of Directors, and was Chairman of the board of directors of Viridity Energy, Inc before it was sold to Ormat Technologies in 2017. Russell received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Dartmouth College.
Dr. Krishna Singh, 73, is the founder of Holtec International, a diversified energy technology company with nine major operations centers in seven countries on five continents, where he has served as president and chief executive officer since 1986. Dr. Singh has been active in the nuclear power industry since 1971 and is a widely-published author in with over 70 technical papers, one textbook and numerous symposia volumes. He is a prolific inventor with and a prolific inventor (119 patents granted, many pending). In addition to Holtec International, Dr. Singh serves on numerous advisory boards in the energy industry including the Nuclear Energy Institute and the University of California Nuclear Engineering Department. Dr. Singh also serves as a member of the board of overseers at the University of Pennsylvania School of Engineering and Applied Science and a director of the Washington DC Atlantic Counsel. Dr. Singh received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (1972), a M.S. in Engineering Mechanics also from Penn (1969), and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from BIT Sindri (Ranchi University), India (1967).
Alex Dimitrief, 61, is an experienced director, Chief Executive Officer, C-suite leader and general counsel who has steered varied energy-related and other global businesses through a wide range of complex commercial, legal and organizational challenges. He has previously served as a director of both public and non-public companies including The We Company, Synchrony Financial (NYSE: SF) and GE Capital Bank and presently sits on the Advisory Board of Cresset Capital Management. As President and Chief Executive Officer of General Electric’s Global Growth Organization, Mr. Dimitrief was responsible for driving GE’s growth in more than 180 countries. Under Mr. Dimitrief’s watch in 2018, GE achieved $76 billion in international orders and secured billions in financing for many of GE’s emerging market customers. As GE’s General Counsel, Mr. Dimitrief served as the principal executive advisor to GE’s Board and led a global team responsible for GE’s legal matters, compliance, SEC reporting, government affairs and environmental safety programs. In previous roles at GE, Mr. Dimitrief was a leader of the transformation of GE Capital (including the IPO/split-off of Synchrony Financial) and led joint venture negotiations for GE Energy in China and Russia. In announcing Mr. Dimitrief’s retirement from GE in January 2019, Chief Executive Officer Larry Culp described Mr. Dimitrief as “one of the most respected leaders at GE” who “effectively represented GE before governments, regulators and customers throughout the world and is widely recognized as a compelling champion of integrity, transparency and the rule of law.” In 2007, Mr. Dimitrief came to GE from after 20 years as a senior partner at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, where he “first chaired” and regularly advised Boards about securities, restructuring, intellectual property, product liability, environmental, governance and commercial disputes. Mr. Dimitrief earned his B.A. from Yale College and his J.D. from Harvard Law School.
Marian “Mimi” Walters, 58, is Chief Commercial Officer for Leading Edge Power Solutions, LLC since November 2019. She is a former Member of the U.S. House of Representatives (the “House”) from California’s 45th District where she worked on key legislation, business and policy initiatives related to energy, technology, environmental and healthcare and served from 2015 to 2019. Ms. Walters was a member of House Leadership and served on the influential Energy and Commerce Committee. She was a member of the Communications and Technology, Digital Commerce and Consumer Protection, and Oversight and Investigations subcommittees. Prior to her election to Congress, Ms. Walters was a member of the California State Senate, from 2008 to 2014, where she served on the Banking and Financial Institutions Committee and was Vice Chair of the Appropriations Committee. She previously served in the California State Assembly and was mayor and council member for the City of Laguna Niguel. Prior to her career in public service, Ms. Walters was an investment professional at Drexel Burnham Lambert and Kidder, Peabody & Co. She earned a B.A. in political science from the University of California, Los Angeles.
Audrey Zibelman, 63, is Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Energy Market Operator (“AEMO”), responsible for overseeing AEMO’s strategy, operations and administrative functions. In addition to taking on role as Chief Executive Officer of AEMO, Ms. Zibelman also serves on the CSIRO Energy Advisory Committee, the Melbourne Energy Institute’s Advisory Board, and as a Director of the Melbourne Recital Centre and the Advanced Energy Economy Institute. Ms. Zibelman has extensive experience in the public, private and not-for profit energy and electricity sectors in the United States. Prior to joining AEMO in March 2017, her roles included Chair of the New York State Public Service Commission (“NYPSC”), from August 2013 to March 2018, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of system operator PJM from January 2008 to February 2013, executive roles with Xcel Energy, from 1992 to 2004, one of the United States largest integrated gas and electricity utilities and served on a number of energy industry advisory groups and Boards. During her tenure at the NYPSC, Ms. Zibelman led the design and implementation of extensive regulatory and retail market changes to modernize and transform the state’s electricity industry under New York Governor Andrew M. Cuomo’s ‘Reforming the Energy Vision’ plan. A recognized national and international expert in energy policy, markets and Smart Grid innovation, Ms. Zibelman is a Founder and past President and CEO of Viridity Energy, Inc., which she formed after more than 25 years of electric utility industry leadership experience in both the public and private sectors. Previously, Ms. Zibelman was the Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of GO15 member organization, PJM, a regional transmission organization responsible for operating the power grid and wholesale power market which serves fourteen states across the eastern United States. Ms. Zibelman also held legal and executive positions at Xcel Energy, served as General Counsel to the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission, and was Special Assistant Attorney General in the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office. During her career, Ms. Zibelman has served on numerous industry-related and non-profit boards, including, but not limited to the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic Reliability Councils. Ms. Zibelman’s board experience also includes Advisor to Secretary of Energy for the U.S. Department of Energy and Advisory Council, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, the New York State Planning Board and the New York State Emergency Planning Council. Ms. Zibelman received her B.A. from Penn State University, her Executive MBA from University of Minnesota — Carlson School of Management and her J.D. from Hamline University of Law.
Our business affairs will be managed under the direction of our board of directors. Our board of directors is expected to consist of seven members.
Our Charter provides that the number of directors, which is fixed at seven members, may be increased or decreased from time to time by a resolution of our board of directors. Our board of directors is divided into three (3) classes with only one class of directors being elected in each year and each class serving a three (3) year term. The directors hold their office for a term of three (3) years or until their respective successors are elected and qualified, subject to such director’s earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal. The term of office of the Class I directors, consisting of Marian “Mimi Walters” and Audrey Zibelman, will expire at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2021. The term of office of the Class II directors, consisting of Joe Mastrangelo and Alex Dimitrief, will expire at expires at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2022. The term of office of the Class III directors, consisting of Russ Stidolph, Krishna P. Singh and Daniel Shribman, will expire at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2023.
The size of the Company’s board of directors is seven directors, five of whom qualify as independent within the meaning of the independent director guidelines of Nasdaq. Alex Dimitrief, Audrey Zibelman, Marian “Mimi” Walters, Daniel Shribman, Russ Stidolph are “independent directors” as defined in the rules of Nasdaq and applicable SEC rules.
Nasdaq rules require that a majority of our board of directors be independent. An “independent director” is defined generally as a person other than an executive officer or employee of a listed company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of a listed company’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our board of directors established the following committees: an audit committee, a compensation committee, and a nominating and corporate governance committee. The proposed composition and responsibilities of each committee are described below. Members will serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our board of directors.
|Audit Committee||Compensation Committee||Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee|
|Alex Dimitrief||Audrey Zibelman||Alex Dimitrief*|
|Audrey Zibelman||Mimi Walters||Russ Stidolph|
|Daniel Shribman*||Russ Stidolph*||Mimi Walters|
The Company’s audit committee oversees the Company’s corporate accounting and financial reporting process. Among other matters, the audit committee:
|●||appoints our independent registered public accounting firm;|
|●||evaluates the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance;|
|●||determines the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm;|
|●||reviews and approves the scope of the annual audit and the audit fee;|
|●||discusses with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the results of the annual audit and the review of the Company’s quarterly financial statements;|
|●||approves the retention of the independent registered public accounting firm to perform any proposed permissible non-audit services;|
|●||monitors the rotation of partners of the independent registered public accounting firm on the Company’s engagement team in accordance with requirements established by the SEC;|
|●||is responsible for reviewing our financial statements and our management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations to be included in our annual and quarterly reports to be filed with the SEC;|
|●||reviews our critical accounting policies and estimates; and|
|●||reviews the audit committee charter and the committee’s performance at least annually.|
The members of the audit committee are Alex Dimitrief and Audrey Zibelman, with Daniel Shribman serving as the chair of the committee. Under the rules of the SEC, members of the audit committee must also meet heightened independence standards. All of the members of the audit committee are independent directors as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq with respect to audit committee membership. Daniel Shribman qualifies as our “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K. Our board of directors adopted a written charter for the audit committee.
Our compensation committee reviews and recommends policies relating to compensation and benefits of our officers and employees. Among other matters, the compensation committee:
|●||reviews and recommends corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation of our chief executive officer and other executive officers;|
|●||evaluates the performance of these officers in light of those goals and objectives and recommend to our board of directors the compensation of these officers based on such evaluations;|
|●||recommends to our board of directors the issuance of stock options and other awards under our stock plans; and|
|●||reviews and evaluates, at least annually, the performance of the compensation committee and its members, including compliance by the compensation committee with its charter.|
The members of our Company’s compensation committee are Audrey Zibelman and Mimi Walters, with Russ Stidolph serving as the chair of the committee. Each of the members of the Company’s compensation committee are independent under the applicable rules of Nasdaq, and each is a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Our board of directors adopted a written charter for the compensation committee.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for making recommendations to our board of directors regarding candidates for directorships and the size and composition of our board of directors. In addition, the nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for overseeing our corporate governance policies and reporting and making recommendations to our board of directors concerning governance matters.
The members of the Company’s nominating and corporate governance committee are Russ Stidolph and Mimi Walters, with Alex Dimitrief serving as the chair of the committee. Each of the members of our nominating and corporate governance committee is an independent director under the applicable rules of Nasdaq relating to nominating and corporate governance committee independence.
Code of Ethics
The Company adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including those officers responsible for financial reporting. The Company expects that, to the extent required by law, any amendments to the code, or any waivers of its requirements, will be disclosed on our website. The information on our website is not part of the prospectus.
Limitation on Liability and Indemnification Matters
The Charter contains provisions that limit the liability of our directors for monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Consequently, our directors will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:
|●||any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders;|
|●||any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;|
|●||unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the DGCL; or|
|●||any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.|
The Charter and our bylaws provide that we are required to indemnify our directors and officers, in each case to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Our bylaws also provide that we are obligated to advance expenses incurred by a director or officer in advance of the final disposition of any action or proceeding, and permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions in that capacity regardless of whether we would otherwise be permitted to indemnify him or her under Delaware law. We entered into agreements to indemnify our directors, executive officers and other employees as determined by our board of directors. With specified exceptions, these agreements provide for indemnification for related expenses including, among other things, attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by any of these individuals in any action or proceeding. We believe that these bylaws provisions and indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. The Company also maintains directors’ and officers’ liability insurance.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in the Charter and bylaws may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors and officers for breach of their fiduciary duty. They may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against our directors and officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit us and our stockholders. Further, a stockholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent that we pay the costs of settlement and damage.
The following disclosure covers the material components of the compensation for our principal executive officer and other most highly compensated executive officer, who are referred to in this section as “named executive officers,” for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. This section should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, along with the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.” Compensation information included in the following section is presented in actual dollar amounts. This section provides information in accordance with the scaled SEC disclosure rules available to “emerging growth companies.”
As an emerging growth company, we have opted to comply with the executive compensation disclosure rules applicable to “smaller reporting companies,” as such term is defined under the Securities Act, which require compensation disclosure for (i) all individuals who served as our principal executive officer or in a similar capacity during fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, (ii) our two most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, and (ii) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided pursuant to clause (ii), but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. We refer to these executive officers collectively as the named executive officers (“NEOs”). This section should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, along with the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.” Compensation information included in the following section is presented in actual dollar amounts. For fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, the NEOs were:
|●||Joe Mastrangelo, Chief Executive Officer;|
|●||Sagar Kurada, Chief Financial Officer;|
|●||Mack Treece, Chief Strategic Alliances Officer;|
Mr. Treece was appointed Chief Financial Officer effective March 5, 2019. Effective as of June 1, 2020, Mr. Treece also assumed the title of Chief Strategic Alliances Officer. As of July 6, 2020, Sagar Kurada assumed the office of Chief Financial Officer from Mr. Treece.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table presents summary information regarding the total compensation paid to, earned by and awarded to each of Eos’s NEOs for 2020.
|Name and Principal Position||Year|| Salary|
| Bonus |
| Stock Awards(1)|
| Option Awards(2)|
| All Other|
| Joe Mastrangelo(3),|
Chief Executive Officer
| Sagar Kurada(5), |
Chief Financial Officer
| Mack Treece, |
Chief Strategic Alliances Officer
|(1)||Represents the restricted stock unit award expense recorded based on the fair value of restricted stock unit granted to our named executive officers on the grant date and the vesting period per restricted stock unit award agreements, as estimated pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of the valuation methodology used, see Note 1, “Stock-Based Compensation” of the notes to Eos Energy Storage LLC consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.|
|(2)||Represents the option award expense recorded based on the fair value of stock options granted to our named executive officers on the grant date and the vesting period per option agreements, as estimated pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718. Grant date fair value is calculated based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For information regarding the assumptions used in determining the grant date fair value, see Note 1, “Stock-Based Compensation” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that may be realized from the option awards by the maned executive officers.|
|(3)||Mr. Mastrangelo does not receive compensation for his service as a director.|
|(4)||For fiscal 2020, Mr. Mastrangelo received a car allowance of $8,668, $54,900 in residential expenses and $23,678 in business travel expense reimbursement.|
|(5)||Mr. Kurada was appointed Chief Financial Officer on July 6, 2020.|
|(6)||For fiscal 2020, Mr. Treece received $8,735 in business travel expense reimbursement.|
Employment Offer Letter with Mr. Mastrangelo
In connection with the engagement of Mr. Mastrangelo as a board advisor, we entered into an employment offer letter dated as of July 26, 2018.
The employment offer letter contained the following material compensation terms:
|●||base compensation consisting of a $25,000 monthly consulting fee, which increased to $400,000 per year upon appointment as full time Chief Executive Officer on August 1, 2019; and|
|●||participation in the Company’s health insurance and other employee benefits Eos also maintains, and an annual car allowance of $7,796.|
Mr. Mastrangelo’s employment offer letter was terminated and replaced with an employment agreement effective as of June 22, 2020, as further described below.
Employment Agreement with Mr. Mastrangelo
Effective as of June 22, 2020 Eos entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Mastrangelo, which replaced and terminated Mr. Mastrangelo’s employment offer letter.
The employment agreement contains the following material compensation terms:
|●||base compensation of $400,000 per year based on full-time employment;|
|●||annual performance-based incentive bonus with an annual target payout of 50% to 100% of base compensation, payable in cash, to be prorated for the 2020 fiscal year;|
|●||participation in the Company’s health insurance and other employee benefits Eos also maintains, along with reimbursement for reasonable travel, lodging, meal and other business-related expenses;|
|●||an initial option grant of 12,000,000 common units with an exercise price of $0.50 per unit, vesting in equal amounts annually over three years; and|
|●||an additional option grant of 6,000,000 common units with an exercise price of $0.50 per unit, vesting in full upon the successful completion of an equity financing transaction occurring prior to June 23, 2023;|
If Mr. Mastrangelo is terminated without “cause” or resigns for “good reason” he will be entitled to a cash payment equal to twelve months base compensation, payable in periodic installments, subject to his execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against Eos and continued compliance with certain restrictive covenants.
Consulting Agreement with Mr. Treece
In connection with the engagement of Mr. Treece as a consultant, we entered into a consulting agreement dated as of March 5, 2019.
The consulting agreement contains the following material compensation terms:
|●||base compensation consisting of a $15,000 monthly consulting fee;|
|●||accrued cash compensation of $8,000 per month, payable upon the closing of an equity financing by the Company;|
|●||monthly grants of equity units of the Company, valued at $7,000 per month; and|
|●||services-related expense reimbursement.|
Mr. Treece’s consulting agreement was terminated and replaced with an employment agreement effective as of June 1, 2020, as further described below.
Employment Agreement with Mr. Treece
Effective as of June 1, 2020 we entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Treece, which replaced and terminated Mr. Treece’s consulting agreement.
The employment agreement contains the following material compensation terms:
|●||base compensation of $325,000 per year based on full-time employment;|
|●||annual performance-based incentive bonus with an annual target payout of 50% to 100% of base compensation, payable in cash, beginning in the calendar year Eos successfully closes an equity financing;|
|●||participation in our health insurance and other employee benefits we also maintain, along with reimbursement for reasonable travel, lodging, meal and other business-related expenses;|
|●||an initial option grant of 1,000,000 common units with an exercise price of $0.50 per unit, vesting in equal amounts annually over three years; and|
|●||an additional option grant of 1,000,000 common units with an exercise price equal to the then-current fair market value of unit, to be granted upon the successful completion of an equity financing transaction prior to termination of employment for any reason, which will vest in equal amounts annually over three years after grant.|
If Mr. Treece is terminated without “cause” or resigns for “good reason” he will be entitled to (i) a lump sum cash payment equal to six months base compensation, and (ii) a prorated amount of any annual bonus otherwise payable during the calendar year of termination, each subject to his execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against Eos and continued compliance with certain restrictive covenants.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
|Option Awards||Stock Awards|
|Name|| Number of|
| Number of |
| Option Exercise |
| Option Expiration |
| Number of shares|
or units of stock
that have not
| Market value of|
|(1)||Beginning on October 23, 2020, so long as Mr. Mastrangelo remains in service, 691,691 of the shares of common stock subject to this option will vest as to 33.33% on each of the first three anniversaries of June 22, 2020; provided, that such shares shall vest in full upon the consummation of a change in control of the Company. The remaining number of shares subject to this option will vest, provided that Mr. Mastrangelo remains in service, on the day the Board determines that the Company has successfully closed an equity financing transaction prior to June 22, 2023. If no such transaction is consummated by June 22, 2023, any unvested portion of the option shall immediately terminate.|
|(2)||For so long as Mr. Kurada remains in service, the shares of common stock subject to this option will vest as to 25% on June 30, 2021, with the remaining vesting in equal annual installments over a three year period.|
|(3)||For so long as Mr. Treece remains in service, the shares of common stock subject to this option will vest as to 33% on June 30, 2021, with the remaining vesting in equal annual installments over a two year period; provided, however, that the shares will vest in full upon a change in control of the Company.|
|(4)||Represents restricted stock units which vest in full on December 16, 2021, provided that Mr. Treece remains in service. The restricted stock units will also vest in full if, prior to such vesting date, Mr. Treece is terminated without cause.|
|(5)||The market value is calculated by multiplying the closing price ($20.84) of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on December 31, 2020, the last trading day of fiscal 2020, by the number of restricted stock units that had not vested.|
Health and Retirement Benefits
We provide medical, dental, vision, life insurance and disability benefits to all eligible employees. The NEOs are eligible to participate in these benefits on the same basis as all other employees.
The compensation committee determines the annual compensation to be paid to the members of our board of directors.
Authorized and Outstanding Stock
The Charter authorizes the issuance of 201,000,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of (x) 200,100,000 authorized shares of common stock and (y) 1,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share. As of January 11, 2021 there were 49,802,417 shares of common stock outstanding, and no shares of preferred stock outstanding. There is no cumulative voting with respect to the election of directors.
Except as otherwise required by law or as otherwise provided in any certificate of designation for any series of preferred stock, the holders of common stock possess all voting power for the election of our directors and all other matters requiring stockholder action and will at all times vote together as one class on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on matters to be voted on by stockholders.
Holders of common stock are entitled to receive such dividends and other distributions, if any, as may be declared from time to time by our board of directors in its discretion out of funds legally available therefor and shall share equally on a per share basis in such dividends and distributions.
Liquidation, Dissolution and Winding Up
In the event of our voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, distribution of assets or winding-up, the holders of common stock will be entitled to receive an equal amount per share of all of our assets of whatever kind available for distribution to stockholders, after the rights of the holders of the preferred stock have been satisfied and after payment or provision for payment of our debts and other liabilities.
Preemptive or Other Rights
Our stockholders have no preemptive or other subscription rights and there is no sinking fund or redemption provisions applicable to common stock.
Election of Directors
The Company’s board of directors are classified into three (3) classes, designated as Class I, Class II and Class II. The directors first elected to Class I hold office for a term expiring at the first annual meeting of stockholders following the Closing; the directors first elected to Class II will hold office for a term expiring at the second annual meeting of stockholders following the Closing; and the directors first elected to Class III will hold office for a term expiring at the third annual meeting of stockholders following the Closing. At each succeeding annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, the successors to the class of directors whose term expires at that meeting will be elected by plurality vote of all votes cast at such meeting to hold office for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders held in the second year following the year of their election.
Our Charter provides that shares of preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series. Our board of directors is authorized to fix the voting rights, if any, designations, powers, preferences, the relative, participating, optional or other special rights and any qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof, applicable to the shares of each series. Our board of directors may, without stockholder approval, issue preferred stock with voting and other rights that could adversely affect the voting power and other rights of the holders of the common stock and could have anti-takeover effects. The ability of our board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of the Company or the removal of existing management. We have no preferred stock outstanding at the date hereof. Although we do not currently intend to issue any shares of preferred stock, we cannot assure you that we will not do so in the future.
Each whole warrant entitles the registered holder to purchase one share of our common stock at a price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment as discussed below, at any time thirty (30) days after the Closing. Pursuant to the warrant agreement, a warrant holder may exercise its warrants only for a whole number of shares of common stock. No fractional warrant will be issued upon separation of the units and only whole warrants will trade. Accordingly, unless you purchase at least two (2) units, you will not be able to receive or trade a whole warrant. The warrants will expire five (5) years after Closing, at 5:00 PM, Eastern Time, or earlier upon redemption or liquidation.
We will not be obligated to deliver any shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of a warrant and will have no obligation to settle such warrant exercise unless a registration statement under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stock underlying the warrants is then effective and a prospectus relating thereto is current, subject to our satisfying our obligations described below with respect to registration. No warrant will be exercisable and we will not be obligated to issue shares of common stock upon exercise of a warrant unless common stock issuable upon such warrant exercise has been registered, qualified or deemed to be exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of the registered holder of the warrants. In the event that the conditions in the two (2) immediately preceding sentences are not satisfied with respect to a warrant, the holder of such warrant will not be entitled to exercise such warrant and such warrant may have no value and expire worthless. In no event will we be required to net cash settle any warrant. In the event that a registration statement is not effective for the exercised warrants, the purchaser of a unit containing such warrant will have paid the full purchase price for the unit solely for the share of common stock underlying such unit.
Under the Warrant Agreement, we agreed that as soon as practicable, but in no event later than fifteen (15) business days after the Closing, we will use our best efforts to file with the SEC this registration statement covering the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants, to cause such registration statement to become effective within sixty (60) business days following the business combination and to maintain a current prospectus relating to those shares of common stock until the warrants expire or are redeemed, as specified in the warrant agreement. If a registration statement covering the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is not effective by the sixtieth (60th) business day after the Closing, warrant holders may, until such time as there is an effective registration statement and during any period when we will have failed to maintain an effective registration statement, exercise warrants on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act or another exemption. Notwithstanding the above, if our common stock is at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that it satisfies the definition of a “covered security” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, we may, at our option, require holders of public warrants who exercise their warrants to do so on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and, in the event we so elect, we will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement, and in the event we do not so elect, we will use our best efforts to register or qualify the shares under applicable blue sky laws to the extent an exemption is not available.
Once the warrants become exercisable, the Company may call the warrants for redemption:
|●||in whole and not in part;|
|●||at a price of $0.01 per warrant;|
|●||upon not less than thirty (30) days’ prior written notice of redemption (the “30-day redemption period”) to each warrant holder; and|
|●||if, and only if, the reported last sale price of the common stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any twenty (20) trading days within a thirty (30) trading day period ending three (3) business days before we send the notice of redemption to the warrant holders.|
If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may not exercise our redemption right if the issuance of shares of common stock upon exercise of the warrants is not exempt from registration or qualification under applicable state blue sky laws or we are unable to effect such registration or qualification. We will use our best efforts to register or qualify such shares of common stock under the blue sky laws of the state of residence in those states in which the warrants were offered by us in the IPO.
We established the last of the redemption criterion discussed above to prevent a redemption call unless there is at the time of the call a significant premium to the warrant exercise price. If the foregoing conditions are satisfied and we issue a notice of redemption of the warrants, each warrant holder will be entitled to exercise its warrant prior to the scheduled redemption date. However, the price of the common stock may fall below the $18.00 redemption trigger price (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) as well as the $11.50 warrant exercise price after the redemption notice is issued.
If we call the warrants for redemption as described above, our management will have the option to require any holder that wishes to exercise its warrant to do so on a “cashless basis.” In determining whether to require all holders to exercise their warrants on a “cashless basis,” our management will consider, among other factors, our cash position, the number of warrants that are outstanding and the dilutive effect on our stockholders of issuing the maximum number of shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of our warrants. If our management takes advantage of this option, all holders of warrants would pay the exercise price by surrendering their warrants for that number of shares of common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of shares of common stock underlying the warrants, multiplied by the excess of the “fair market value” (defined below) of the common stock over the exercise price of the warrants by (y) the fair market value. The “fair market value” shall mean the average reported last sale price of the common stock for the ten (10) trading days ending on the third (3rd) trading day prior to the date on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of warrants. If the Company’s management takes advantage of this option, the notice of redemption will contain the information necessary to calculate the number of shares of common stock to be received upon exercise of the warrants, including the “fair market value” in such case. Requiring a cashless exercise in this manner will reduce the number of shares to be issued and thereby lessen the dilutive effect of a warrant redemption. The Company believes this feature is an attractive option to it if it does not need the cash from the exercise of the warrants after the business combination. If we call our warrants for redemption and our management does not take advantage of this option, the Sponsor and its permitted transferees would still be entitled to exercise their private placement warrants for cash or on a cashless basis using the same formula described above that other warrant holders would have been required to use had all warrant holders been required to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis, as described in more detail below.
A holder of a warrant may notify us in writing in the event it elects to be subject to a requirement that such holder will not have the right to exercise such warrant, to the extent that after giving effect to such exercise, such person (together with such person’s affiliates), to the warrant agent’s actual knowledge, would beneficially own in excess of 4.9% or 9.8% (or such other amount as a holder may specify) of the shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such exercise.
If the number of outstanding shares of common stock is increased by a stock dividend payable in shares of common stock, or by a split-up of shares of common stock or other similar event, then, on the effective date of such stock dividend, split-up or similar event, the number of shares of common stock issuable on exercise of each warrant will be increased in proportion to such increase in the outstanding shares of common stock. A rights offering to holders of common stock entitling holders to purchase shares of common stock at a price less than the fair market value will be deemed a stock dividend of a number of shares of common stock equal to the product of (i) the number of shares of common stock actually sold in such rights offering (or issuable under any other equity securities sold in such rights offering that are convertible into or exercisable for common stock) and (ii) one (1) minus the quotient of (x) the price per share of common stock paid in such rights offering divided by (y) the fair market value. For these purposes (i) if the rights offering is for securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock, in determining the price payable for common stock, there will be taken into account any consideration received for such rights, as well as any additional amount payable upon exercise or conversion and (ii) fair market value means the volume weighted average price of common stock as reported during the ten (10) trading day period ending on the trading day prior to the first date on which the shares of common stock trade on the applicable exchange or in the applicable market, regular way, without the right to receive such rights.
In addition, if the Company, at any time while the warrants are outstanding and unexpired, pay a dividend or make a distribution in cash, securities or other assets to the holders of common stock on account of such shares of common stock (or other shares of the Company’s capital stock into which the warrants are convertible), other than (a) as described above, or (b) certain ordinary cash dividends, then the warrant exercise price will be decreased, effective immediately after the effective date of such event, by the amount of cash and/or the fair market value of any securities or other assets paid on each share of common stock in respect of such event.
If the number of outstanding shares of common stock is decreased by a consolidation, combination, reverse stock split or reclassification of shares of common stock or other similar event, then, on the effective date of such consolidation, combination, reverse stock split, reclassification or similar event, the number of shares of common stock issuable on exercise of each warrant will be decreased in proportion to such decrease in outstanding shares of common stock.
Whenever the number of shares of common stock purchasable upon the exercise of the warrants is adjusted, as described above, the warrant exercise price will be adjusted by multiplying the warrant exercise price immediately prior to such adjustment by a fraction (x) the numerator of which will be the number of shares of common stock purchasable upon the exercise of the warrants immediately prior to such adjustment, and (y) the denominator of which will be the number of shares of common stock so purchasable immediately thereafter.
In case of any reclassification or reorganization of the outstanding shares of common stock (other than those described above or that solely affects the par value of such shares of common stock), or in the case of any merger or consolidation of us with or into another corporation (other than a consolidation or merger in which we are the continuing corporation and that does not result in any reclassification or reorganization of our outstanding shares of common stock), or in the case of any sale or conveyance to another corporation or entity of the assets or other property of us as an entirety or substantially as an entirety in connection with which we are dissolved, the holders of the warrants will thereafter have the right to purchase and receive, upon the basis and upon the terms and conditions specified in the warrants and in lieu of the shares of our common stock immediately theretofore purchasable and receivable upon the exercise of the rights represented thereby, the kind and amount of shares of stock or other securities or property (including cash) receivable upon such reclassification, reorganization, merger or consolidation, or upon a dissolution following any such sale or transfer, that the holder of the warrants would have received if such holder had exercised their warrants immediately prior to such event. If less than 70% of the consideration receivable by the holders of common stock in such a transaction is payable in the form of common stock in the successor entity that is listed for trading on a national securities exchange or is quoted in an established over-the-counter market, or is to be so listed for trading or quoted immediately following such event, and if the registered holder of the warrant properly exercises the warrant within thirty (30) days following public disclosure of such transaction, the warrant exercise price will be reduced as specified in the warrant agreement based on the Black-Scholes value (as defined in the warrant agreement) of the warrant. The purpose of such exercise price reduction is to provide additional value to holders of the warrants when an extraordinary transaction occurs during the exercise period of the warrants pursuant to which the holders of the warrants otherwise do not receive the full potential value of the warrants in order to determine and realize the option value component of the warrant. This formula is to compensate the warrant holder for the loss of the option value portion of the warrant due to the requirement that the warrant holder exercise the warrant within thirty (30) days of the event. The Black-Scholes model is an accepted pricing model for estimating fair market value where no quoted market price for an instrument is available.
The warrants have been issued in registered form under the Warrant Agreement, which was filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 22, 2020 with the SEC File No. 001-39291) for a complete description of the terms and conditions applicable to the warrants.
The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision, and that all other modifications or amendments will require the vote or written consent of the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants and, solely with respect to any amendment to the terms of the private placement warrants, a majority of the then outstanding private placement warrants.
The warrants may be exercised upon surrender of the warrant certificate on or prior to the expiration date at the offices of the warrant agent, with the exercise form on the reverse side of the warrant certificate completed and executed as indicated, accompanied by full payment of the exercise price (or on a cashless basis, if applicable), by certified or official bank check payable to us, for the number of warrants being exercised. The warrant holders do not have the rights or privileges of holders of common stock and any voting rights until they exercise their warrants and receive shares of common stock. After the issuance of shares of common stock upon exercise of the warrants, each holder will be entitled to one (1) vote for each share held of record on all matters to be voted on by stockholders.
No fractional shares will be issued upon exercise of the warrants. If, upon exercise of the warrants, a holder would be entitled to receive a fractional interest in a share, we will, upon exercise, round down to the nearest whole number of shares of common stock to be issued to the warrant holder.
Private Placement Warrants
The private placement warrants (including the shares issuable upon exercise of such warrants) are not transferable, assignable or salable until thirty (30) days after the Closing, subject to certain exceptions, and they are not be redeemable by the Company so long as they are held by members of the Sponsor or its permitted transferees. Otherwise, the private placement warrants are identical to the warrants sold in the IPO except that the private placement warrants, so long as they are held by the Sponsor or its permitted transferees, (i) are redeemable by us, (ii) may not (including the common stock issuable upon exercise of these warrants), subject to certain limited exceptions, be transferred, assigned or sold by the holders until thirty (30) days after the Closing, (iii) may be exercised by the holders on a cashless basis, (iv) are entitled to registration rights and (v) for so long as they are held by the Sponsor, are not exercisable more than five (5) years from the effective date of the IPO registration statement in accordance with FINRA Rule 5110(f)(2)(G)(i).
If holders of the private placement warrants elect to exercise them on a cashless basis, they would pay the exercise price by surrendering their warrants for that number of shares of common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of shares of common stock underlying the warrants, multiplied by the excess of the “fair market value” (defined below) of the common stock over the exercise price of the warrants by (y) the fair market value. The “fair market value” shall mean the average reported last sale price of the common stock for the ten (10) trading days ending on the third (3rd) trading day prior to the date on which the notice of warrant exercise is sent to the warrant agent.
The Company has not paid any cash dividends on our common stock to date. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial conditions subsequent to the Closing. The payment of any cash dividends subsequent to a business combination will be within the discretion of our board of directors at such time. Further, if we incur any indebtedness, our ability to declare dividends may be limited by restrictive covenants we may agree to in connection therewith.
Registration Rights Agreement
The holders of founder shares, private placement units, private placement shares, private placement warrants, shares of common stock underlying the private placement warrants, and securities that may be issued upon conversion of Working Capital Loans will have registration rights to require us to register a sale of any of our securities held by them pursuant to a registration rights agreement to be signed prior to or on the effective date of the IPO. These holders will be entitled to make up to three demands, excluding short form registration demands, that we register such securities for sale under the Securities Act. In addition, these holders will have “piggy-back” registration rights to include their securities in other registration statements filed by us. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Sponsor may not exercise its demand and “piggyback” registration rights after five (5) and seven (7) years, respectively, after the effective date of the IPO registration statement and may not exercise its demand rights on more than one occasion.
In connection with the Closing, we entered into the Registration Rights Agreement with the Securityholder (as defined therein) (the “Registration Rights Agreement”). Under the Registration Rights Agreement, we have certain obligations to the Registrable Securities. We are required to, within forty-five (45) days after the Closing, file a registration statement registering the resale of the Registrable Securities. Holders of the Registrable Securities will also have certain “piggy-back” registration rights with respect to registration statements and rights to us to register for resale such securities pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act. We will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements. The registration rights agreement will not contemplate the payment of penalties or liquidated damages as a result of a failure to register, or delays with respect to the registration of, the Registrable Securities.
Certain Anti-Takeover Provisions of Delaware Law, the Company’s Charter and Bylaws
The Charter, bylaws and the DGCL contain provisions that could have the effect of rendering more difficult, delaying, or preventing an acquisition deemed undesirable by our board of directors. These provisions could also make it difficult for stockholders to take certain actions, including electing directors who are not nominated by the members of our board of directors or taking other corporate actions, including effecting changes in our management. For instance, our board of directors will be empowered to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death, or removal of a director in certain circumstances; and our advance notice provisions in our bylaws will require that stockholders must comply with certain procedures in order to nominate candidates to our board of directors or to propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting.
Our authorized but unissued common stock and preferred stock will be available for future issuances without stockholder approval and could be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes, including future offerings to raise additional capital, acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued and unreserved common stock and preferred stock could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.
Pursuant to Rule 144, a person who has beneficially owned restricted shares of our common stock or warrants for at least six months would be entitled to sell their securities provided that (i) such person is not deemed to have been one of our affiliates at the time of, or at any time during the three months preceding, a sale and (ii) we are subject to the Exchange Act periodic reporting requirements for at least three months before the sale and have filed all required reports under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the 12 months (or such shorter period as we were required to file reports) preceding the sale.
Persons who have beneficially owned restricted shares of our common stock or warrants for at least six months but who are our affiliates at the time of, or at any time during the three months preceding, a sale, would be subject to additional restrictions, by which such person would be entitled to sell within any three-month period only a number of securities that does not exceed the greater of:
|●||1% of the total number of shares of common stock then outstanding (as of January 11, 2021, there were 49,802,417 shares of our common stock outstanding); or|
|●||the average weekly reported trading volume of the common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to the sale.|
Sales by our affiliates under Rule 144 are also limited by manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us.
Restrictions on the Use of Rule 144 by Shell Companies or Former Shell Companies
Rule 144 is not available for the resale of securities initially issued by shell companies (other than business combination related shell companies) or issuers that have been at any time previously a shell company. However, Rule 144 also includes an important exception to this prohibition if the following conditions are met:
|●||the issuer of the securities that was formerly a shell company has ceased to be a shell company;|
|●||the issuer of the securities is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;|
|●||the issuer of the securities has filed all Exchange Act reports and materials required to be filed, as applicable, during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports and materials), other than Current Reports on Form 8-K; and|
|●||at least one year has elapsed from the time that the issuer filed current Form 10 type information with the SEC reflecting its status as an entity that is not a shell company.|
As a result, our stockholders are able to sell their founder shares and private placement units, and the securities underlying the foregoing, as applicable, pursuant to Rule 144 without registration one year after we completed our initial business combination.
We are no longer a shell company following the Closing, and so, once the conditions set forth in the exceptions listed above are satisfied, Rule 144 will become available for the resale of the above noted restricted securities.
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock by:
|●||each person who is, or is expected to be, the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of any series of our voting common stock;|
|●||each of our current executive officers and directors;|
|●||all executive officers and directors of the Company, as a group, upon the closing of the Business Combination.|
The beneficial ownership of common stock of the Company is based on 49,802,417 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of January 11, 2021.
Beneficial ownership is determined according to the rules of the SEC, which generally provide that a person has beneficial ownership of a security if he, she or it possesses sole or shared voting or investment power over that security, including options and warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within sixty (60) days.
Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock beneficially owned by them.
| Number of |
| Percentage of|
|Name and Address of Beneficial Owners Executive Officers and Directors|
|Dr. Balakrishnan G. Iyer(1)||-||-||%|
|Dr. Krishna Singh(4)(6)||2,537,512||5.1||%|
|Marian “Mimi” Walters(1)||-||-||%|
|All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (Ten Individuals)||10,592,544||21.2||%|
|B. Riley Financial, Inc.(8)||6,881,279||13.8||%|
|*||Less than 1%.|
|(1)||The business address of each of these entities or individuals is c/o 3920 Park Avenue Edison, New Jersey 08820.|
|(2)||Includes 11,130 shares of common stock underlying restricted stock units.|
|(3)||Represents (i) 177,696 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of vested options held by Mr. Stidolph and (ii) 6,777,925 shares of common stock in which Mr. Stidoloph has a pecuniary interest in that are held directly by AltEnergy LLC, or AltEnergy, AltEnergy Storage LLC, or AltEnergy I, AltEnergy Storage II LLC, or AltEnergy II, AltEnergy Storage V LLC, or AltEnergy V, AltEnergy VI LLC, or AltEnergy VI, AltEnergy Storage Bridge LLC, or Bridge, AltEnergy Transmission LLC, or Transmission, AltEnergy Storage Bridge Phase II LLC, or Bridge II (collectively, the “AltEnergy Shares”). Mr. Stidolph is the managing director of AltEnergy, the managing member of each of AltEnergy I, AltEnergy II, AltEnergy VI, AltEnergy V, Bridge, Transmission and Bridge II, and has voting and dispositive power with respect to the AltEnergy Shares. Mr. Stidolph disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. The address of Mr. Stidolph and each of the above referenced entities is 137 Rowayton Avenue, Rowayton, CT 06853.|
|(4)||40% of these shares are pledged to BMRG for the benefit of certain indemnitees and may not be transferred until the date that is the earlier of (i) September 7, 2022; and (ii) the date on which the specified indemnified matters pursuant to the Merger Agreement have been finally resolved, and either (x) no obligations are due and payable as a result thereof, or (y) all obligations have been paid to the indemnitees in full.|
|(5)||Amount includes 397,500 shares of common stock that are subject to earnout restrictions under the Sponsor Earnout Letter.|
|(6)||Represents securities held directly by Holtec International, Singh Real Estate Enterprises Inc., Tequesta Properties Inc. and HI-MED, LLC. Mr. Singh holds direct and/or indirect ownership of these entities and holds the full voting and dispositive power with respect to Holtec International, Tequesta Properties, Inc. and HI-MED, LLC. The address of Mr. Singh and each of the above referenced entities is 1 Holtec Blvd, Camden, NJ 08104.|
|(7)||Represents securities held directly by AltEnergy LLC, or AltEnergy, AltEnergy Storage LC, or AltEnergy I, AltEnergy Storage II LLC, or AltEnergy II, AltEnergy Storage V LLC, or AltEnergy V, AltEnergy VI LLC, or AltEnergy VI, AltEnergy Storage Bridge LLC, or Bridge, AltEnergy Transmission LLC, or Transmission, AltEnergy Storage Bridge Phase II, or Bridge II. Mr. Stidolph is the managing director of AltEnergy, the managing member of each of AltEnergy I, AltEnergy II, AltEnergy VI, AltEnergy V, Bridge, Transmission and Bridge II, and has voting and dispositive power with respect to the AltEnergy Shares. Mr. Stidolph disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.|
|(8)||The amount includes (i) 390,000 shares of common stock held by BRC Partners Opportunity Fund, L.P. (“BRC”), (ii) 25,000 shares of common stock underlying public warrants held by BRC, (iii) 2,550,750 shares of common stock held by the Sponsor, (iv) 325,000 shares of common stock underlying private placement warrants held by the Sponsor, (v) 103,029 shares of common stock held by B. Riley Securities, Inc. (“BRS”), (vi) 2,167,000 shares of common stock held by B. Riley Principal Investments, LLC (“BRPI”), and (vii) 1,320,500 shares of common stock that are subject to earnout restrictions under the Sponsor Earnout Letter. BRPI is the sole member of the Sponsor and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of B. Riley Financial, Inc. BRC Partners Management GP, LLC (“BRPGP”) is the general partner of BRC and B. Riley Capital Management, LLC (“BRCM”) is the parent company of BRPGP and B. Riley Financial is the parent company of each of BRCM and BRS. B. Riley Financial has voting and dispositive power over the securities held by each of BRPI, BRS and BRC. Bryant Riley is the Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of B. Riley Financial and has voting and dispositive power over the securities held by B. Riley Financial. Each of BRPI and Mr. Riley disclaims beneficial ownership over any securities directly held by the Sponsor, BRS, BRPGP, BRCM or BRC other than to the extent of any pecuniary interest he or it may have therein, directly or indirectly. The address for this stockholder is 11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 800, Los Angeles, CA 90025.|
On November 16, 2020, we consummated the Business Combination.
The Selling Securityholders may offer and sell, from time to time, any or all of the shares of common stock or warrants being offered for resale by this prospectus, which consists of:
|●||up to 4,375,000 founder shares originally issued in a private placement to the Sponsor and subsequently distributed to certain BMRG directors and members of the Sponsor;|
|●||up to 325,000 private placement warrants issued in a private placement to the Sponsor;|
|●||up 29,644,680 shares of common stock held by other Selling Securityholders of the Company,|
|●||up to 650,000 shares of common stock that were a constituent part of the private placement units.|
In addition, this prospectus relates to the offer and sale of up to 8,750,000 shares of common stock that are issuable by us upon the exercise of the Public Warrants, which were previously registered.
The term “Selling Securityholders” includes the securityholders listed in the table below and their permitted transferees.
The table below provides, as of the date of this prospectus, information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock and warrants of each Selling Securityholder, the number of shares of common stock and number of warrants that may be sold by each Selling Securityholder under this prospectus and that each Selling Securityholder will beneficially own after this offering. We have based percentage ownership on 49,802,417 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 11, 2021.
Because each Selling Securityholder may dispose of all, none or some portion of their securities, no estimate can be given as to the number of securities that will be beneficially owned by a Selling Securityholder upon termination of this offering. For purposes of the table below, however, we have assumed that after termination of this offering none of the securities covered by this prospectus will be beneficially owned by the Selling Securityholder and further assumed that the Selling Securityholders will not acquire beneficial ownership of any additional securities during the offering. In addition, the Selling Securityholders may have sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of, or may sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of, at any time and from time to time, our securities in transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act after the date on which the information in the table is presented.
|Shares of Common Stock||Warrants to Purchase Common Stock|
|Name||Number Beneficially Owned Prior to Offering||Number Registered for Sale Hereby||Number Beneficially Owned After Offering||Percent Owned After Offering||Number Beneficially Owned Prior to Offering||Number Registered for Sale Hereby||Number Beneficially Owned After Offering||Percent Owned After Offering|
|ACE Energy Efficiency SPC||860,535||860,535||-||-||-||-||-||-|
|Acme Operating Company||54,756||54,756||-||-||-||-||-||-|
|Adelaro US Limited(1)||108,385||108,385||-||-||-||-||-||-|
|Agile Energy Limited(2)||864||864||-||-||-||-||-||-|
|AME Cloud Ventures(5)||86,687||86,687||-||-||-||-||-||-|
|Asterra Holdings LLC(6)||22,996||22,996|